Study ties red and processed meats to worse colon cancer survival

July 2, 2013 by Amy Norton, Healthday Reporter
Study ties red and processed meats to worse colon cancer survival
Patients may be wise to cut down on these foods, experts say.

(HealthDay)—People with colon cancer who continue to eat a lot of red and processed meats may have increased odds of dying from the disease, a new study suggests.

The findings, published online July 1 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, do not prove that steaks and themselves affect a person's chances of surviving . But experts said the study supports what's already recommended for colon cancer patients, and everyone else: Eating a healthy diet rich in , and low in red and .

"I think this underscores the importance of a lifelong healthy diet," said lead researcher Marjorie McCullough, of the American Cancer Society.

McCullough's team found that among more than 2,300 colon cancer patients, those with a high intake of red and processed meats both before and after their diagnosis were at greater risk of dying from the disease.

Specifically, patients who ate at least four to five servings per week before and after their diagnosis were 79 percent more likely to die from colon cancer than patients who consistently ate less.

In addition, patients who'd had the biggest appetite for red and processed meats before their diagnosis faced a heightened risk of dying from any cause, including heart disease or stroke.

None of that, however, proves that the high itself is to blame, said Dr. Jeffrey Meyerhardt, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Center in Boston.

"This doesn't give us enough to make definitive ," said Meyerhardt, who wrote an editorial published with the study. "It's suggestive of some role for red and processed meats in the overall health of colon cancer survivors."

Still, Meyerhardt agreed that the results support having a healthful diet after a colon —and ideally, your whole life.

The findings are based on more than 2,300 U.S. adults diagnosed with colon cancer that had not yet spread to distant sites in the body. Over the next seven and a half years, nearly 1,000 patients died—more than 400 from colon cancer itself.

The patients were all part of a larger study on nutrition and cancer, and had been regularly completing diet questionnaires before their colon cancer diagnosis. So McCullough's team was able to look at people's diet habits over time, and how they correlated with survival.

When the researchers looked only at pre-diagnosis eating habits, colon cancer patients who had downed the most red and processed meats—eight or more servings per week for men, and six or more for women—were 29 percent more likely to die during the study period.

But that seemed to be explained mainly by deaths from or stroke. When it came to the risk of dying from colon cancer, only people who ate a lot of red and processed meats both before and after diagnosis faced worse odds.

McCullough said there are many studies showing "convincing evidence" that red-meat-lovers are, on average, at increased risk of developing colon cancer in the first place.

The reasons are not completely clear. But, Meyerhardt said, both red and processed meats can generate certain cancer-promoting chemicals—including heterocyclic amines and N-nitroso compounds—that could damage cells in the colon lining.

That, in theory, is how the meats might raise the odds of developing colon cancer. It's not clear how they would affect colon cancer survival, Meyerhardt said.

But, he said, based on the current findings, it is "reasonable" for colon who had been eating a lot of red and processed meats to cut down.

"This is a question patients ask all the time: 'What should I eat? Should I cut down on red meat?'" Meyerhardt said.

For now, it seems that cutting down is wise—although the question of how much red meat is OK cannot be answered, Meyerhardt said. But both he and McCullough said trimming back on steaks and lunch meat alone is not enough.

"A includes eating a lot plant foods," McCullough said. She advised getting plenty of fruits and vegetables, whole grains—rather than the refined grains in white bread and many processed foods—and healthy fats, like those in vegetable oils.

Explore further: Starchy, high carbohydrate diet associated with recurrence of colon cancer

More information: Learn more about colon cancer from the U.S. National Cancer Institute.

Related Stories

Starchy, high carbohydrate diet associated with recurrence of colon cancer

November 7, 2012
Colon cancer survivors whose diet is heavy in complex sugars and carbohydrate-rich foods are far more likely to have a recurrence of the disease than are patients who eat a better balance of foods, a new study by Dana-Farber ...

Study finds red meat may increase colon polyp risk

October 3, 2011
(Medical Xpress) -- Cancer investigators from Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center and the Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Tennessee Valley Health System in Nashville) have found that eating a steady diet of red or processed ...

Another study finds colonoscopy can save lives

June 19, 2013
(HealthDay)—There's more evidence that routine colonoscopy confers life-extending benefits.

Alcohol consumption and risk of colon cancer in people with a family history of such cancer

January 30, 2012
A study based on more than 87,000 women and 47,000 men in the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, looks at whether there is a link between colon cancer and alcohol, and if so at what level of ...

Recommended for you

Shooting the achilles heel of nervous system cancers

July 20, 2017
Virtually all cancer treatments used today also damage normal cells, causing the toxic side effects associated with cancer treatment. A cooperative research team led by researchers at Dartmouth's Norris Cotton Cancer Center ...

Molecular changes with age in normal breast tissue are linked to cancer-related changes

July 20, 2017
Several known factors are associated with a higher risk of breast cancer including increasing age, being overweight after menopause, alcohol intake, and family history. However, the underlying biologic mechanisms through ...

Immune-cell numbers predict response to combination immunotherapy in melanoma

July 20, 2017
Whether a melanoma patient will better respond to a single immunotherapy drug or two in combination depends on the abundance of certain white blood cells within their tumors, according to a new study conducted by UC San Francisco ...

Discovery could lead to better results for patients undergoing radiation

July 19, 2017
More than half of cancer patients undergo radiotherapy, in which high doses of radiation are aimed at diseased tissue to kill cancer cells. But due to a phenomenon known as radiation-induced bystander effect (RIBE), in which ...

Definitive genomic study reveals alterations driving most medulloblastoma brain tumors

July 19, 2017
The most comprehensive analysis yet of medulloblastoma has identified genomic changes responsible for more than 75 percent of the brain tumors, including two new suspected cancer genes that were found exclusively in the least ...

Novel CRISPR-Cas9 screening enables discovery of new targets to aid cancer immunotherapy

July 19, 2017
A novel screening method developed by a team at Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center—using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing technology to test the function of thousands of tumor genes in mice—has ...

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

neversaidit
2 / 5 (3) Jul 02, 2013
NO LINK TO ORIGINAL STUDY
gwrede
2.3 / 5 (6) Jul 02, 2013
Most of the studies on red meat are done in the US. That's also the place where a significant part of the meat is BBQ or pan fried. That leaves big black markings on the surface, which many people abroad consider unhealthy.

I would like to see a study where the effects of red meat itself are studied. Such meat includes boiled, microwaved, and low-temperature pan meat. It may well be that such meat is no more dangerous than poultry, or even soy based "meat".

Tangent2
1.8 / 5 (5) Jul 02, 2013
Great.. another waste of time article that drones on about how they still don't know anything new:

"For now, it seems that cutting down is wise—although the question of how much red meat is OK cannot be answered, Meyerhardt said."
neversaidit
3 / 5 (2) Jul 03, 2013
i like how there's a link to another article, describing a study by the same author,
"Starchy, high carbohydrate diet associated with recurrence of colon cancer".

http://jco.ascopu.../current
there is no study of meat consumption, nor any study by McCullough in current issue. this article can be just as well made up!

medicalxpress needs to learn to link to the studies, even if they are behind a paywall; or at least give proper references! i don't have time to waste on looking for the original study based on "clues" that the article author leaves.
neversaidit
5 / 5 (1) Jul 08, 2013
http://jco.ascopu...aabb6714
found it.

yet another worthless study that doesn't separate red meat from processed meat. studies like this getting published is a joke.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.