Japanese supercomputer takes big byte out of the brain

August 7, 2013 by Peter Mcowan, The Conversation
Here’s looking at you kid. Credit: PA/Peter Byrne

Researchers in Japan have used the powerful K computer, the world's fastest supercomputer, to simulate the complex neural structure of our brain.

Using a popular suite of neuron simulating software called NEST, the K computer is able to pull together the power of 82,944 processors to create a network simulating 1.73 billion nerve cells connected by 10.4 trillion – approximating about 1% of the raw of a .

Just how much of a leap forward is this technological feat in progressing our understanding of our brilliant biological brains?

Flicking the switches

Our brains are complicated things, at the heart of our current understanding of how they work is the idea that billions of specialised , called , connect together and pass signals to give rise to the activities of thought, sensing and action.

At one level a neuron can be considered to be a fairly simple biological switch. It absorbs the signals coming in, and if that signal is strong enough, the neuron fires it to the other neurons it's connected to. This sort of processing can be implemented on too. That's where the K computer comes in.

The project is the result of work by researchers from the Riken HPCI Programme for Computational Life Sciences at the Okinawa Institute of Technology Graduate University in Japan and Germany's Jülich Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine.

In terms of speed, our are actually quite slow at flicking the biological switches. They work at a rate of milliseconds (they need time to recover after firing) and combine in exquisite patterns. But because of the sheer number of them, there's still a lot of computing going on per second.

Electronic devices can switch much faster. The K computer used about one of memory, the equivalent of combining 250,000 home computers. But the simulation still took 40 minutes to provide the of one second of activity of the in real, biological, time.

Show and tell

Brain researchers like me are frankly impressed by these big numbers and computing power – they are the bedrock of being able to move towards understanding the actions of massive clusters of brain neurons. However, there's more to understanding than simply building.

The research team freely admit this work was about showing what could be done with today's technology – their simulations as of yet don't actually address any significant questions about how our brains think. It's a bit like building a super-connected motorway network, populated with simulated cars, but not yet looking at how that road network reacts to the holiday road rush.

There's no doubt that such giant scale simulations will soon yield answers to mysteries about how our brains operate, how we learn, how we perceive and perhaps even how we feel. But any simulation is only as good as the assumptions it makes in building the software.

Even with the open source NEST software, if you look in detail there are a range of parameters in the simulation that need to be set, and changing these parameters can often significantly change what you get out of the simulation.

The simple switching metaphor is also only an approximation; we're finding biological neurons to be far more complex in the way they process their signals. And then there are the interesting and not yet particularly well understood effects of wide-scale neuro-modulators like nitric oxide, a compound present in the brain that has been implicated in changing neuron's local excitability and firing properties.

Add to the mix the increasing evidence that glia cells (which don't carry signals like neurons but make up around ten to 50 times more of the brain mass than neurons) aren't just there to provide physical support for the neurons but are an integral part of the brain's function, and the computational problem gets even bigger.

Exquisite architecture

Perhaps most important, our brains have an exquisite architecture, from the distinct layers in the cortex to the orientation columns in the early visual areas. Throughout its structure, particular types of signals travel through different configurations of neurons and the form dictates function.

The current K computer simulation impressively joins up lots of neurons to lots of other neurons, leveraging raw computing power, but in the future we'll need to better understand how the brain uses functional and architectural specialisation to accomplish its work.

To fully model and understand our brain – in particular to be able to explain things we already know about brain function and predict new properties that we can then test – we'll need to bring together the skills and knowledge of other research disciplines such as neuroscience and computer science, in the same way that the Japanese-led simulation pulls together the power of myriad computer processors.

And with Japan ready to develop the next generation supercomputer by 2020 – 100 times faster than the K computer – and other countries set to compete or go further, there's certainly much more to come.

Explore further: Largest neuronal network simulation to date achieved using Japanese supercomputer

Related Stories

Largest neuronal network simulation to date achieved using Japanese supercomputer

August 2, 2013
By exploiting the full computational power of the Japanese supercomputer, K Computer, researchers from the RIKEN HPCI Program for Computational Life Sciences, the Okinawa Institute of Technology Graduate University (OIST) ...

Neural simulations hint at the origin of brain waves

July 24, 2013
For almost a century, scientists have been studying brain waves to learn about mental health and the way we think. Yet the way billions of interconnected neurons work together to produce brain waves remains unknown. Now, ...

Chips that mimic the brain

July 22, 2013
No computer works as efficiently as the human brain – so much so that building an artificial brain is the goal of many scientists. Neuroinformatics researchers from the University of Zurich and ETH Zurich have now made ...

Neuroscience to benefit from hybrid supercomputer memory

June 12, 2013
Motivated by extraordinary requirements for neuroscience, IBM Research, EPFL, and ETH Zürich through the Swiss National Supercomputing Center CSCS, are exploring how to combine different types of memory – DRAM, which is ...

Spaun, the new human brain simulator, can carry out tasks (w/ video)

November 30, 2012
(Phys.org)—One of the challenges of understanding the complex behavior of animals is to relate the behavior to the complex processes occurring within the brain. So far, neural models have not been able to bridge this gap, ...

Recommended for you

When the eyes move, the eardrums move, too

January 23, 2018
Simply moving the eyes triggers the eardrums to move too, says a new study by Duke University neuroscientists.

Cognitive training helps regain a younger-working brain

January 23, 2018
Relentless cognitive decline as we age is worrisome, and it is widely thought to be an unavoidable negative aspect of normal aging. Researchers at the Center for BrainHealth at The University of Texas at Dallas, however, ...

Lifting the veil on 'valence,' brain study reveals roots of desire, dislike

January 23, 2018
The amygdala is a tiny hub of emotions where in 2016 a team led by MIT neuroscientist Kay Tye found specific populations of neurons that assign good or bad feelings, or "valence," to experience. Learning to associate pleasure ...

Your brain responses to music reveal if you're a musician or not

January 23, 2018
How your brain responds to music listening can reveal whether you have received musical training, according to new Nordic research conducted in Finland (University of Jyväskylä and AMI Center) and Denmark (Aarhus University).

New neuron-like cells allow investigation into synthesis of vital cellular components

January 22, 2018
Neuron-like cells created from a readily available cell line have allowed researchers to investigate how the human brain makes a metabolic building block essential for the survival of all living organisms. A team led by researchers ...

Finding unravels nature of cognitive inflexibility in fragile X syndrome

January 22, 2018
Mice with the genetic defect that causes fragile X syndrome (FXS) learn and remember normally, but show an inability to learn new information that contradicts what they initially learned, shows a new study by a team of neuroscientists. ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Aug 07, 2013
"...the world's fastest supercomputer..."

Did I miss something? Since when was K faster than Sequoia, Titan and Tianhe-2?
not rated yet Aug 08, 2013
"...wide-scale neuro-modulators like nitric oxide, a compound present in the brain that has been implicated in changing neuron's local excitability and firing properties."

Another wide-scale neuro-modulator is brain specific estrogen, a compound present in the brain that has been implicated in storage and processing of sound in addition to changing a neuron's local excitability and firing properties as well.

A flawless fit to the overall puzzle of the brain and mind.
Aug 09, 2013
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
not rated yet Aug 09, 2013
Would our two brains use quantum states to process information?
Sir Roger Penrose is giving this matter some consideration.
The point being is that the process that we call a mind might not be resident in the brain. This might be a rationalist delusion.
If the mind is not in the brain, why then can we influence thoughts and experiences by directly stimulating the brain?
Naturely if the interface between the Quantum world and the macro world is disturbed one would expect consequences.
There is nothing in evolutionary theory that suggests that the organism may not utilize quantum phenomena.
On the contrary, evolution would make use of every advantage offered. And if quantum computing is more powerful than analogue or digital computing we must anticipate that it would be used.
not rated yet Aug 10, 2013
"Electronic devices can switch much faster. The K computer used about one petabyte of memory, the equivalent of combining 250,000 home computers. But the simulation still took 40 minutes to provide the computational power of one second of neuronal network activity of the brain in real, biological, time."

That doesn't say what it first appears to say. Any virtual machine will run much slower than the real machine it is being run on.

As scientists in both biology and computers discover the secrets of neural nets, I would expect that future electronic neural nets would be composed of modules much as the brain has modules, and each module would be a neural net processor specializing in a certain type of decision, sense, calculation, or other action. The neural net will be a physical construction, rather than a mere simulation on a digital computer.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.