New tool assesses quality of work relationships in the clinic

New tool assesses quality of work relationships in the clinic
The Work Relationships Scale seems to be a valid tool for measuring the quality of relationships in primary care settings, according to a study published in the November/December issue of the Annals of Family Medicine.

(HealthDay)—The Work Relationships Scale (WRS) seems to be a valid tool for measuring the quality of relationships in primary care settings, according to a study published in the November/December issue of the Annals of Family Medicine.

Erin P. Finley, Ph.D., M.P.H., from South Texas Veterans Health Care System in San Antonio, developed and validated a scale assessing relationships within clinics (WRS) in 17 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care clinics (457 clinicians/staff surveyed). Validation included comparison against semi-structured clinic member interviews (247) and VA Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients (SHEP) data.

The researchers found that WRS scores were significantly associated with clinic-level reporting of the SHEP variables of overall rating of personal doctor/nurse (P < 0.01) and overall rating of health care (P < 0.05). Across both low-scoring and high-scoring clinics, interview data describing relationship characteristics were consistent with variability in WRS scores.

"Relationships play an important role in shaping care delivery and should be assessed as part of efforts to improve patient care within primary care settings," the authors write.


Explore further

A happy patient is well connected to a doctor

More information: Abstract
Full Text
Journal information: Annals of Family Medicine

Copyright © 2013 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: New tool assesses quality of work relationships in the clinic (2014, January 3) retrieved 6 December 2019 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2014-01-tool-quality-relationships-clinic.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments