Patient safety violations and poor record keeping common in clinical trial concerns

June 25, 2014

Failure to protect patient safety and poor record keeping were among the most common violations picked up by the US regulator in the running of clinical trials over a period of seven years, reveals a study published online in the Journal of Medical Ethics.

The study authors reviewed the content of 84 first warning letters issued by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) following site visits to 46 trial sponsors, 20 lead researchers, and 18 institutional review boards, which assess and monitor safety, between 2005 and 2012.

The analysis revealed that the most common concern raised among clinical trial sponsors was a failure to monitor progress according to the stated schedule (58+%), followed by a failure to obtain the agreement of the principal investigator (35%). One in four of these warnings concerned new drug studies; the rest related to devices.

The most common concerns raised by the FDA to lead researchers were failure to adhere to the stated plan for the investigation (95%) and failure to protect the safety of trial participants, including the reporting of side effects (55%). Some 40% of warnings additionally concerned poor record keeping. Most (80%) of the warnings related to drug trials.

The most common reason for warning institutional review boards (61%) was a failure to follow standard operating procedures and inadequate record keeping (55%).

The researchers compared their findings with previously published research in the same arena, dating back as far as 1997. They found that while regulatory compliance had generally improved, supervision had worsened.

And two new serious violations had cropped up in the interim: failure to get the green light from an institutional review board before pressing ahead; and submitting false data to the FDA and/or sponsors.

In a bid to boost compliance with good clinical practice, the authors suggest that every regulatory agency charged with overseeing should pay main participating centres a visit, and regularly publish details of their findings.

"Fair and appropriate procedures for handling violations during clinical trials need to be developed and implemented globally in order to protect human rights, wellbeing and safety, and to raise awareness of ethical behaviour," they conclude.

Explore further: Heart risks of glucose-lowering drugs being overlooked in clinical trials

More information: Analysis of warning letters issued by the US Food and Drug Administration to clinical investigators, institutional review boards and sponsors: a retrospective study, DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101829

Related Stories

Study examines gap in federal oversight of clinical trials

March 4, 2014

An analysis of nearly 24,000 active human research clinical trials found that between 5 percent and 16 percent fall into a regulatory gap and are not covered by two major federal regulations, according to a study in the March ...

Study examines reasons for delay, denial of new drugs by FDA

January 21, 2014

Several potentially preventable deficiencies, including failure to select optimal drug doses and suitable outcome measures for a study, accounted for significant delays in the approval of new drugs by the Food and Drug Administration ...

FDA approves expanded indication for CRT devices

April 15, 2014

(HealthDay)—The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved an application from Medtronic for revised labeling for two cardiac resynchronization pacemakers (CRT-P) and eight cardiac resynchronization defibrillators (CRT-D). ...

Recommended for you

Vitamin D supplements could help pain management

May 23, 2017

Vitamin D supplementation combined with good sleeping habits may help manage pain-related diseases. This paper published in the Journal of Endocrinology, reviews published research on the relationship between vitamin D levels, ...

Recommended daily protein intake too low for the elderly

May 23, 2017

You can find the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) on the nutrition labels of all your processed food. Food manufacturers are obliged to list the nutritional value of their products, and therefore must mention the percent ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.