New brain mechanism study could advance artificial intelligence

August 5, 2014, University of Reading
New brain mechanism study could advance artificial intelligence

(Medical Xpress)—Research at the University of Reading has provided a new understanding of how our brain processes information to change how we see the world.

Using a simple , akin to a 3D version of the 80s game Pong, the researchers examined how the recalibrates its perception of slant in order to bounce a moving ball through a target hoop.

They found that the brain uses an internal simulation of the laws of physics to change its perception of slant in order to 'score' consistently.

The findings provide a unique insight into why humans are such an adaptable and skillful species. With the development of effective , engineers are starting to look at how humans' sensory systems effortlessly achieve what is currently impossible for robotic systems.

The study, funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and the Wellcome Trust, saw participants play a 3D game where they had to adjust the slant of a surface so that a moving ball bounced off it and through a target hoop.

Part way through the game, without telling the participants, researchers altered the bounce of the ball so that the surface behaved differently to the slant signalled by visual cues.

When faced with the altered bounce, participants changed their behaviour to continue scoring points. At the same time, their brain recalibrated their perception of slant - simulating the laws of physics to actually change how the slant looked. In a separate group, making the ball spin eliminated this recalibration.

Dr. Peter Scarfe from the School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, who conducted the study with colleague Prof. Andrew Glennerster, said: "We take for granted our amazing 'adaptability' which allows us to enjoy such past-times as DIY or playing ball sports. However, little is known about the brain mechanisms that enable us to do these activities. Our research shows how our brains appear to have an intimate understanding of the laws of physics. In addition to aiding skillful action, this can change how we perceive the world around us."

The researchers say understanding the basic mechanisms that allow the brain to calibrate sensory information will prove vital in the design of future autonomous robots.

Dr. Scarfe continued: "The exhibits expert skill in making predictions about how the world behaves. For example, a child can bounce a ball off a wall and understand how spinning the ball alters its bounce. However, many of the fine motor skills of a young child are currently way beyond the capability of modern robots. Understanding how adapt to feedback about the consequences of actions is likely to be key in solving this problem."

Explore further: Visual perception: Vertical disparity corrects stereo correspondence

More information: Humans Use Predictive Kinematic Models to Calibrate Visual Cues to Three-Dimensional Surface Slant is published in the Journal of Neuroscience: www.jneurosci.org/content/34/31/10394.full.pdf

Related Stories

Visual perception: Vertical disparity corrects stereo correspondence

August 27, 2013
It is well known that humans perceive 3D structures of scenes using the horizontal difference of images observed by our eyes— referred to as horizontal (binocular) disparity. It is also known that vertical disparity produces ...

No clowning around: Juggling study may shed light on how our senses help us run

February 11, 2014
(Medical Xpress)—Juggling may seem like mere entertainment, but a study led by Johns Hopkins engineers used this circus skill to gather critical clues about how vision and the sense of touch help control the way humans ...

Ready, steady, slow! Why top sportsmen might have 'more time' on the ball

September 7, 2012
(Medical Xpress)—Professional ball game players report the sensation of the ball 'slowing-down' just before they hit it. Confirming these anecdotal comments, a new study published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B shows ...

How brain systems interact to carry out cognitive processes

August 4, 2014
People not only use their eyes to see, but also to move. It takes less than a fraction of a second to execute the loop that travels from the brain to the eyes, and then to the hands and/or arms. Bijan Pesaran is trying to ...

Recommended for you

When the eyes move, the eardrums move, too

January 23, 2018
Simply moving the eyes triggers the eardrums to move too, says a new study by Duke University neuroscientists.

Cognitive training helps regain a younger-working brain

January 23, 2018
Relentless cognitive decline as we age is worrisome, and it is widely thought to be an unavoidable negative aspect of normal aging. Researchers at the Center for BrainHealth at The University of Texas at Dallas, however, ...

Lifting the veil on 'valence,' brain study reveals roots of desire, dislike

January 23, 2018
The amygdala is a tiny hub of emotions where in 2016 a team led by MIT neuroscientist Kay Tye found specific populations of neurons that assign good or bad feelings, or "valence," to experience. Learning to associate pleasure ...

Your brain responses to music reveal if you're a musician or not

January 23, 2018
How your brain responds to music listening can reveal whether you have received musical training, according to new Nordic research conducted in Finland (University of Jyväskylä and AMI Center) and Denmark (Aarhus University).

New neuron-like cells allow investigation into synthesis of vital cellular components

January 22, 2018
Neuron-like cells created from a readily available cell line have allowed researchers to investigate how the human brain makes a metabolic building block essential for the survival of all living organisms. A team led by researchers ...

Finding unravels nature of cognitive inflexibility in fragile X syndrome

January 22, 2018
Mice with the genetic defect that causes fragile X syndrome (FXS) learn and remember normally, but show an inability to learn new information that contradicts what they initially learned, shows a new study by a team of neuroscientists. ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

mikael_murstam
5 / 5 (1) Aug 05, 2014
Well of course we are using an internal model of the world. I could have told them that :P How else would we predict the outcome?
cabhanlistis
5 / 5 (1) Aug 05, 2014
Well of course we are using an internal model of the world. I could have told them that :P How else would we predict the outcome?

I don't know if this article really clarifies the study, but the study reveals how accurate our internal simulations are and how well we can recalibrate, and apparently the calibration exhibits "expert knowledge" of physics, even if we aren't able to describe them with the words of a physicist or take accurate measurements.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.