Study suggests neurobiological basis of human-pet relationship

dog
Credit: Noël Zia Lee, Wikimedia Commons

It has become common for people who have pets to refer to themselves as "pet parents," but how closely does the relationship between people and their non-human companions mirror the parent-child relationship? A small study from a group of Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) researchers makes a contribution to answering this complex question by investigating differences in how important brain structures are activated when women view images of their children and of their own dogs. Their report is being published in the open-access journal PLOS ONE.

"Pets hold a special place in many people's hearts and lives, and there is compelling evidence from clinical and laboratory studies that interacting with pets can be beneficial to the physical, social and emotional wellbeing of humans," says Lori Palley, DVM, of the MGH Center for Comparative Medicine, co-lead author of the report. "Several previous studies have found that levels of neurohormones like oxytocin – which is involved in pair-bonding and maternal attachment – rise after interaction with pets, and new brain imaging technologies are helping us begin to understand the neurobiological basis of the relationship, which is exciting."

In order to compare patterns of involved with the human-pet bond with those elicited by the maternal-child bond, the study enrolled a group of women with at least one child aged 2 to 10 years old and one pet dog that had been in the household for two years or longer. Participation consisted of two sessions, the first being a home visit during which participants completed several questionnaires, including ones regarding their relationships with both their child and pet dog. The participants' dog and child were also photographed in each participants' home.

The second session took place at the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging at MGH, where functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) – which indicates levels of activation in specific brain structures by detecting changes in blood flow and oxygen levels – was performed as participants lay in a scanner and viewed a series of photographs. The photos included images of each participant's own child and own dog alternating with those of an unfamiliar child and dog belonging to another study participant. After the scanning session, each participant completed additional assessments, including an image recognition test to confirm she had paid close attention to photos presented during scanning, and rated several images from each category shown during the session on factors relating to pleasantness and excitement.

Of 16 women originally enrolled, complete information and MR data was available for 14 participants. The imaging studies revealed both similarities and differences in the way important brain regions reacted to images of a woman's own child and own dog. Areas previously reported as important for functions such as emotion, reward, affiliation, visual processing and social interaction all showed increased activity when participants viewed either their own child or their own dog. A region known to be important to bond formation – the substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area (SNi/VTA) – was activated only in response to images of a participant's own child. The , which is involved in facial recognition and other visual processing functions, actually showed greater response to own-dog images than own-child images.

"Although this is a small study that may not apply to other individuals, the results suggest there is a common brain network important for pair-bond formation and maintenance that is activated when mothers viewed images of either their child or their dog," says Luke Stoeckel, PhD, MGH Department of Psychiatry, co-lead author of the PLOS ONE report. "We also observed differences in activation of some regions that may reflect variance in the evolutionary course and function of these relationships. For example, like the SNi/VTA, the nucleus accumbens has been reported to have an important role in pair-bonding in both human and animal studies. But that region showed greater deactivation when mothers viewed their own-dog images instead of greater activation in response to own-child images, as one might expect. We think the greater response of the fusiform gyrus to of participants' may reflect the increased reliance on visual than verbal cues in human-animal communications."

Co-author Randy Gollub, MD, PhD, of MGH Psychiatry adds, "Since fMRI is an indirect measure of neural activity and can only correlate brain activity with an individual's experience, it will be interesting to see if future studies can directly test whether these patterns of brain activity are explained by the specific cognitive and emotional functions involved in human-animal relationships. Further, the similarities and differences in brain activity revealed by functional neuroimaging may help to generate hypotheses that eventually provide an explanation for the complexities underlying human-animal relationships."

The investigators note that further research is needed to replicate these findings in a larger sample and to see if they are seen in other populations – such as women without children, fathers and parents of adopted children – and in relationships with other animal species. Combining fMRI studies with additional behavioral and physiological measures could obtain evidence to support a direct relationship between the observed and the purported functions.


Explore further

Dog ownership benefits families of children with autism, researcher finds

Provided by Massachusetts General Hospital
Citation: Study suggests neurobiological basis of human-pet relationship (2014, October 3) retrieved 20 March 2019 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2014-10-neurobiological-basis-human-pet-relationship.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
1 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Oct 03, 2014
It has become common for people who have pets to refer to themselves as "pet parents,"


that is only common among those who don't think too well.

stupid hippies.

Oct 03, 2014
So, knuckle-draggers like you don't have that problem, eh?

Oct 03, 2014
"The photos included images of each participant's own child and own dog alternating with those of an unfamiliar child and dog belonging to another study participant"

Yet for some reason they didn't add further controls like showing images of the woman's own car, her favorite shoes, money and jewelery.

How do they differentiate form possessiveness?

Oct 03, 2014
"that is only common among those who don't think too well.

stupid hippies."

Poor guy. His parents hated him. What other comparison can you make? You feed a pet, bathe it, shelter it, nurture it (I'm using the specific example of a canine.) It in return develops a dependency and bond with you. Buy a goldfish man, keep your head up.

Oct 03, 2014
The dog we have is a pet. Nothing more, nothing less. I have told my children to NOT save the dog if it puts your life in danger, the dog is there to protect you, not you to protect the dog.

If starving, the dog will become lunch with no hesitation.

Oct 04, 2014
Many of these topics are more interesting in the character they betray of the commentors.

Oct 04, 2014
Chastised for 'anthropomorphic' description of our cats' behaviour, I countered that careful observation will demonstrate their assorted 'purrsonalities'...

We're well aware that cats' social group is the 'Nest'. It's where momma-cats raise their kittens in a shared creche, to where they bring food and play-things, to where yearling kitty-cats will bring stuff for some months before striking out to seek their own territories...

So, we co-opt the system. Our home becomes their 'Nest', we take the rôle of über-momma cat and they exhibit mildly neotenous behaviour, such as mutual grooming...

Done deal.

Of course, it can get a bit trying when they walk off with SD cards, memory sticks, adaptor cables and such. Took two cats to remove my spare USB trackball from 'In-Tray'. A stack of click-top lunch boxes to store small stuff does mitigate their mischief...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more