Research suggests the conscious experience of choice may be constructed after we act

May 3, 2016 by Bill Hathaway, Yale University
Research suggests the conscious experience of choice may be constructed after we act
Credit: Michael S. Helfenbein. Photo courtesy of Shutterstock

Sometimes, decisions we believe we make consciously, such as clicking on a link on a webpage or reaching for a cup of coffee, have already been made — a trick of the mind that may happen more than we think, new research by Yale University psychologists suggest.

"Our minds may be rewriting history," said Adam Bear, a Ph.D. student in the Department of Psychology and lead author of the paper published April 28 in the journal Psychological Science.

Bear and Paul Bloom performed a couple of simple experiments to test how we experience choices. In one experiment, participants were told that five white circles would appear on the computer screen in front of them and, in rapid-fire sequence, one would turn . They were asked to predict which one would turn red and mentally note this. After a circle turned red, participants then recorded by keystroke whether they had chosen correctly, had chosen incorrectly, or had not had time to complete their choice.

The circle that turned red was always selected randomly, so probability dictates that participants should predict the correct circle 20% of the time. But when they only had a fraction of a second to make a prediction, these participants were likely to report that they correctly predicted which circle would change color more than 20% of the time. In contrast, when participants had more time to make their guess—approaching a full second—the reported number of accurate predictions dropped back to expected levels of 20% success, suggesting that weren't simply lying about their accuracy to impress the experimenters.

What happened, Bear suggests, is that events were rearranged in subjects' minds: People subconsciously perceived the color red before they predicted it would appear, but consciously experienced these two things in the opposite order. The conscious experience of choice may be constructed after we act—even when it feels like it is the cause of our behavior, say the researchers.

Bear and Bloom's research builds on past work suggesting that many decisions seem to be under more conscious control than they actually are. In many cases, consciousness may simply be window dressing, note the researchers.

Bear said it is unknown whether this illusion is caused by a quirk in perceptual processing that can only be reproduced in the lab or whether it might have "far more pervasive effects on our everyday lives and sense of free will."

Explore further: Expectation may be essential to memory formation

More information: A. Bear et al. A Simple Task Uncovers a Postdictive Illusion of Choice, Psychological Science (2016). DOI: 10.1177/0956797616641943

Related Stories

Expectation may be essential to memory formation

March 28, 2016
A theory that links memory encoding to expectations of future relevance may better explain how human memory works, according to a team of Penn State psychologists.

Imagination can influence perception

June 16, 2011
Imagining something with our mind's eye is a task we engage in frequently, whether we're daydreaming, conjuring up the face of a childhood friend, or trying to figure out exactly where we might have parked the car. But how ...

Surprise—subtle distractors may divert action more than overt ones

July 16, 2015
What should have been a straightforward psychology experiment at Brown University instead threw researchers a curve: When subjects performed the simple action of reaching toward a target on a computer screen, the trajectory ...

Subconscious learning shapes pain responses

May 22, 2015
In a new study led from Sweden's Karolinska Institutet, researchers report that people can be conditioned to associate images with particular pain responses – such as improved tolerance to pain – even when they are not ...

Curiosity leads us to seek out unpleasant, painful outcomes

April 8, 2016
Curiosity is a powerful motivator, leading us to make important discoveries and explore the unknown. But new research shows that our curiosity is sometimes so powerful that it leads us to choose potentially painful and unpleasant ...

Recommended for you

Study: Tinder loving cheaters—dating app facilitates infidelity

February 23, 2018
The popular dating app Tinder is all about helping people form new relationships. But for many college-aged people, it's also helping those in relationships cheat on their romantic partners.

The 'loudness' of our thoughts affects how we judge external sounds

February 23, 2018
The "loudness" of our thoughts—or how we imagine saying something—influences how we judge the loudness of real, external sounds, a team of researchers from NYU Shanghai and NYU has found.

Looking for the origins of schizophrenia

February 23, 2018
Schizophrenia may be related to neurodevelopmental changes, including brain's inability to generate an appropriate vascular system, according to new study resulted from a partnership between the D"Or Institute for Research ...

Color of judo uniform has no effect on winning

February 22, 2018
New research on competitive judo data finds a winning bias for the athlete who is first called, regardless of the colour of their uniform. This unique study, published in Frontiers in Psychology, puts to rest the debate on ...

Infants are able to learn abstract rules visually

February 22, 2018
Three-month-old babies cannot sit up or roll over, yet they are already capable of learning patterns from simply looking at the world around them, according to a recent Northwestern University study published in PLOS One.

Antidepressants are more effective than placebo at treating acute depression in adults, concludes study

February 22, 2018
Meta-analysis of 522 trials includes the largest amount of unpublished data to date, and finds that antidepressants are more effective than placebo for short-term treatment of acute depression in adults.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) May 03, 2016
So, real conscious choice takes time. Otherwise it's akin to a mindless reflex. No news there.
not rated yet May 03, 2016
I agree with bruere -- unless there is something in the article that's not reflected in the press release. Presumably, the conscious part of the brain has some kind of minimum processing time. As the stimulus and response gets closer and closer to this minimum time -- we can expect instances of confusion to result. In particular, the subject may confuse the order of events. How do the authors discount these kinds of explanation and fix on their favored hypotheses. The most one can say is that the data are not inconsistent with their hypothesis or with the hypothesis of confusion.
not rated yet May 03, 2016
...the reported number of accurate predictions dropped back to expected levels of 20% success, suggesting that participants weren't simply lying about their accuracy to impress the experimenters.
It's unclear why the participants weren't simply instructed to physically select their prediction (by click or keystroke). I think it's this kind of subjectivity that opens the door to erroneous conclusions like, "it's not torture, it's enhanced interrogation and it's legitimate science." It looks more like pseudoscience.
In many cases, consciousness may simply be window dressing, note the researchers.
Consciousness is just a dresser of windows, your mind is not capable of critical thinking, your mind rearranges things and tricks you, you must rely on us to tell you what you're really thinking. As if...
not rated yet May 03, 2016
It is more likely that the same process as is seen in similar phenomena occurs, that is, initially the mind models both conditions before selecting one. If this superposition of states exists at the time the lights change then the actual condition makes the choice and so the person feels like they made the correct choice.

This is what leads gamblers to believe that they can predict the outcome of events. The correct outcome is highlighted *after* the event in the memory of the *before* condition. This is why nobody can utilise this 'subtle' isn't real.

The authors should consider the association with gambling even if just using their own model of the phenomena as studied.
not rated yet May 04, 2016
Making a conscious "choice," by using a supposed independent ability to pick something specific, in relation to one or more other options, is really just simply acknowledging which option we are attracted to the most, and then heading in that direction. Desire has to already be present or the idea of making a choice won't even come to mind. Desire must also be there or the options will simply fade away.

And have you noticed that we always head in the direction of the strongest desire and that we aren't consciously creating desire? It arises on its own, as do all thoughts and feelings.

Consciousness is late to the party, so to speak, after options arise, desire arises, and the direction forward becomes clear. Saying, "I chose it!" is just not an accurate description of what actually is happening, but simply a boost to the ongoing creation of the illusory ego, which is what most people seem to think they are. Or more accurately, what Consciousness is tricked into thinking it is.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.