Research suggests the conscious experience of choice may be constructed after we act

May 3, 2016 by Bill Hathaway
Research suggests the conscious experience of choice may be constructed after we act
Credit: Michael S. Helfenbein. Photo courtesy of Shutterstock

Sometimes, decisions we believe we make consciously, such as clicking on a link on a webpage or reaching for a cup of coffee, have already been made — a trick of the mind that may happen more than we think, new research by Yale University psychologists suggest.

"Our minds may be rewriting history," said Adam Bear, a Ph.D. student in the Department of Psychology and lead author of the paper published April 28 in the journal Psychological Science.

Bear and Paul Bloom performed a couple of simple experiments to test how we experience choices. In one experiment, participants were told that five white circles would appear on the computer screen in front of them and, in rapid-fire sequence, one would turn . They were asked to predict which one would turn red and mentally note this. After a circle turned red, participants then recorded by keystroke whether they had chosen correctly, had chosen incorrectly, or had not had time to complete their choice.

The circle that turned red was always selected randomly, so probability dictates that participants should predict the correct circle 20% of the time. But when they only had a fraction of a second to make a prediction, these participants were likely to report that they correctly predicted which circle would change color more than 20% of the time. In contrast, when participants had more time to make their guess—approaching a full second—the reported number of accurate predictions dropped back to expected levels of 20% success, suggesting that weren't simply lying about their accuracy to impress the experimenters.

What happened, Bear suggests, is that events were rearranged in subjects' minds: People subconsciously perceived the color red before they predicted it would appear, but consciously experienced these two things in the opposite order. The conscious experience of choice may be constructed after we act—even when it feels like it is the cause of our behavior, say the researchers.

Bear and Bloom's research builds on past work suggesting that many decisions seem to be under more conscious control than they actually are. In many cases, consciousness may simply be window dressing, note the researchers.

Bear said it is unknown whether this illusion is caused by a quirk in perceptual processing that can only be reproduced in the lab or whether it might have "far more pervasive effects on our everyday lives and sense of free will."

Explore further: Expectation may be essential to memory formation

More information: A. Bear et al. A Simple Task Uncovers a Postdictive Illusion of Choice, Psychological Science (2016). DOI: 10.1177/0956797616641943

Related Stories

Expectation may be essential to memory formation

March 28, 2016
A theory that links memory encoding to expectations of future relevance may better explain how human memory works, according to a team of Penn State psychologists.

Imagination can influence perception

June 16, 2011
Imagining something with our mind's eye is a task we engage in frequently, whether we're daydreaming, conjuring up the face of a childhood friend, or trying to figure out exactly where we might have parked the car. But how ...

Surprise—subtle distractors may divert action more than overt ones

July 16, 2015
What should have been a straightforward psychology experiment at Brown University instead threw researchers a curve: When subjects performed the simple action of reaching toward a target on a computer screen, the trajectory ...

Subconscious learning shapes pain responses

May 22, 2015
In a new study led from Sweden's Karolinska Institutet, researchers report that people can be conditioned to associate images with particular pain responses – such as improved tolerance to pain – even when they are not ...

Curiosity leads us to seek out unpleasant, painful outcomes

April 8, 2016
Curiosity is a powerful motivator, leading us to make important discoveries and explore the unknown. But new research shows that our curiosity is sometimes so powerful that it leads us to choose potentially painful and unpleasant ...

Recommended for you

Itsy bitsy spider: Fear of spiders and snakes is deeply embedded in us

October 19, 2017
Snakes and spiders evoke fear and disgust in many people, even in developed countries where hardly anybody comes into contact with them. Until now, there has been debate about whether this aversion is innate or learnt. Scientists ...

Inflamed support cells appear to contribute to some kinds of autism

October 18, 2017
Modeling the interplay between neurons and astrocytes derived from children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), researchers at University of California San Diego School of Medicine, with colleagues in Brazil, say innate ...

Study suggests psychedelic drugs could reduce criminal behavior

October 18, 2017
Classic psychedelics such as psilocybin (often called magic mushrooms), LSD and mescaline (found in peyote) are associated with a decreased likelihood of antisocial criminal behavior, according to new research from investigators ...

Taking probiotics may reduce postnatal depression

October 18, 2017
Researchers from the University of Auckland and Otago have found evidence that a probiotic given in pregnancy can help prevent or treat symptoms of postnatal depression and anxiety.

Schizophrenia disrupts the brain's entire communication system, researchers say

October 17, 2017
Some 40 years since CT scans first revealed abnormalities in the brains of schizophrenia patients, international scientists say the disorder is a systemic disruption to the brain's entire communication system.

Before assigning responsibility, our minds simulate alternative outcomes, study shows

October 17, 2017
How do people assign a cause to events they witness? Some philosophers have suggested that people determine responsibility for a particular outcome by imagining what would have happened if a suspected cause had not intervened.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) May 03, 2016
So, real conscious choice takes time. Otherwise it's akin to a mindless reflex. No news there.
not rated yet May 03, 2016
I agree with bruere -- unless there is something in the article that's not reflected in the press release. Presumably, the conscious part of the brain has some kind of minimum processing time. As the stimulus and response gets closer and closer to this minimum time -- we can expect instances of confusion to result. In particular, the subject may confuse the order of events. How do the authors discount these kinds of explanation and fix on their favored hypotheses. The most one can say is that the data are not inconsistent with their hypothesis or with the hypothesis of confusion.
not rated yet May 03, 2016
...the reported number of accurate predictions dropped back to expected levels of 20% success, suggesting that participants weren't simply lying about their accuracy to impress the experimenters.
It's unclear why the participants weren't simply instructed to physically select their prediction (by click or keystroke). I think it's this kind of subjectivity that opens the door to erroneous conclusions like, "it's not torture, it's enhanced interrogation and it's legitimate science." It looks more like pseudoscience.
In many cases, consciousness may simply be window dressing, note the researchers.
Consciousness is just a dresser of windows, your mind is not capable of critical thinking, your mind rearranges things and tricks you, you must rely on us to tell you what you're really thinking. As if...
not rated yet May 03, 2016
It is more likely that the same process as is seen in similar phenomena occurs, that is, initially the mind models both conditions before selecting one. If this superposition of states exists at the time the lights change then the actual condition makes the choice and so the person feels like they made the correct choice.

This is what leads gamblers to believe that they can predict the outcome of events. The correct outcome is highlighted *after* the event in the memory of the *before* condition. This is why nobody can utilise this 'subtle' isn't real.

The authors should consider the association with gambling even if just using their own model of the phenomena as studied.
not rated yet May 04, 2016
Making a conscious "choice," by using a supposed independent ability to pick something specific, in relation to one or more other options, is really just simply acknowledging which option we are attracted to the most, and then heading in that direction. Desire has to already be present or the idea of making a choice won't even come to mind. Desire must also be there or the options will simply fade away.

And have you noticed that we always head in the direction of the strongest desire and that we aren't consciously creating desire? It arises on its own, as do all thoughts and feelings.

Consciousness is late to the party, so to speak, after options arise, desire arises, and the direction forward becomes clear. Saying, "I chose it!" is just not an accurate description of what actually is happening, but simply a boost to the ongoing creation of the illusory ego, which is what most people seem to think they are. Or more accurately, what Consciousness is tricked into thinking it is.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.