Low blood sugars in newborns linked to later difficulties

August 8, 2017
Credit: University of Auckland

A newborn condition affecting one in six babies has been linked to impairment in some high-level brain functions that shows up by age 4.5 years.

Researchers found that children who had experienced low levels as newborns were two to three times more likely to have difficulties with executive function (skills for problem-solving, planning, memory and attention) and visual-motor co-ordination (skills for fine control of movement, and understanding what you see) at age 4.5 years than children who had levels.

Overall, the lower the blood sugar levels, or the more often they dropped, the greater the impairment was. Strikingly, children who had experienced a drop in blood sugar that was not detected using routine blood sugar monitoring were four times more likely to have difficulties with these skills – the first time this has been shown.

There was no link with lowered intelligence as measured by IQ.

The findings, published in top-ranking journal JAMA Pediatrics, are the latest from a major long-term study, dubbed the "CHYLD" study (Children with Hypoglycaemia and their Later Development), by an international research team led by Distinguished Professor Jane Harding at the University of Auckland-based Liggins Institute.

The team includes researchers from the Liggins Institute, the University of Auckland, Waikato Hospital, the University of Canterbury and the University of Waterloo. They are following 614 New Zealand babies born at risk of levels (neonatal hypoglycaemia) into childhood to see if the condition affects their later growth and development.

Low blood sugar affects up to 15 percent of all babies, and is the only common preventable cause of brain damage in infancy. At-risk babies – up to a third of all born - are those born premature, smaller or larger than usual and babies whose mothers have diabetes.

Health guidelines say at-risk babies should be tested with heel-prick blood tests in the first few hours after birth. If their blood sugar is too low, they are treated with dextrose (sugar) gel to return it to normal levels – a breakthrough treatment pioneered in 2013 by Professor Harding and her team.

Half of the babies in the CHYLD study were diagnosed with, and treated for low blood sugars, as per guidelines. Seventy percent received extra, continuous monitoring of their blood sugar levels, which detected in some babies low levels that were not diagnosed by the routine blood tests. Researchers thoroughly assessed these babies' growth and development at two years, and again at 4.5 years (477 of the original 614 babies took part in the latest follow-up).

"At two years there was no relationship between blood sugar levels and later brain development, but at age 4.5 years, it's clear that the children who experienced low were more likely to have specific difficulties," says Professor Harding.

"We don't know yet what these impairments mean for the child in practical terms, but executive function and visual motor integration are believed to be important for learning at school, particularly for maths and reading."

To investigate whether the impairments at 4.5 years translate to learning or behaviour difficulties at school, the research team are now starting to follow up the children at age 9-10 years, supported by a $1.2 million grant from the Health Research Council.

"What was especially concerning in our 4.5 year results was the four-fold increase in risk of difficulties in children who had experienced low blood sugars that were not detected in routine testing," says the paper's lead author, Dr Chris McKinlay, also from the Liggins Institute. "This is the first time this has been shown."

Internationally, there is no agreed cut-off for safe versus unsafe levels of in newborns, he says. The one most commonly used in New Zealand, and in the CHYLD study, is <2.6 mmol/L, but international authorities have recommended cut-offs as low as 1.4 mmol/L and as high as 3.3 mmol/L.

"If we find at age 9-10 these children are more likely to have reading and maths difficulties, then we may urgently need to rethink what the diagnostic threshold should be," says Professor Harding.

"And if even who were treated are at greater risk of impairment, this raises the possibility that some damage is already done before they receive treatment."

This will make the findings of another ongoing study she is leading, hPOD, all the more relevant.

"In hPOD, we're looking at whether the dextrose gel treatment could be routinely given to all at-risk as a preventative, before they develop low blood sugars – and before any damage could be done."

Explore further: Dose of dextrose gel lowers risk of low blood sugar in newborns

More information: Christopher J. D. McKinlay et al. Association of Neonatal Glycemia With Neurodevelopmental Outcomes at 4.5 Years, JAMA Pediatrics (2017). DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1579

Related Stories

Dose of dextrose gel lowers risk of low blood sugar in newborns

October 25, 2016
A single dose of dextrose gel, rubbed inside a newborn's mouth an hour after birth, can lower their risk of developing neonatal hypoglycaemia, according to a randomized study published in PLOS Medicine by Jane Alsweiler from ...

Exercising safely with diabetes

July 7, 2017
(HealthDay)—Exercise is a powerful tool for managing diabetes.

Researchers identify safe level to treat low blood sugar in newborns

October 14, 2015
Researchers funded by the National Institutes of Health have shown that treating hypoglycemia, or low blood glucose, in newborns according to current recommendations is safe and appears to prevent brain damage.

Cheap dextrose gel could help prevent cause of brain damage in newborns

September 24, 2013
A cheap and easy-to-administer dextrose gel should be used to treat low blood sugars in newborns, a common problem that affects up to 15% of otherwise healthy babies, and a preventable cause of brain damage, according to ...

Artificial pancreas improves blood sugar control in young kids

April 3, 2017
An artificial pancreas, which delivers insulin in an automated way to individuals with type 1 diabetes, appears to be safe and effective for use in children ages 5 to 8 years, a new study finds. Results will be presented ...

Surprising link between blood sugar and brain cancer found

May 3, 2017
New research further illuminates the surprising relationship between blood sugar and brain tumors and could begin to shed light on how certain cancers develop.

Recommended for you

Is rushing your child to the ER the right response?

October 16, 2017
If a child gets a small burn from a hot pan, starts choking or swallows medication, parents may struggle to decide whether to provide first aid at home or rush them to the hospital, suggests a new national poll.

Happier mealtimes, healthier eating for kids

October 13, 2017
(HealthDay)—Parents who struggle to get their children to follow a healthy diet may want to make dinnertime a pleasant experience, new research suggests.

Children born prematurely have greater risk of cognitive difficulties later in life

October 11, 2017
Babies born preterm have a greater risk of developing cognitive, motor and behavioural difficulties and these problems persist throughout school years, finds a new study led by Queen Mary University of London (QMUL).

Helping preemies avoid unnecessary antibiotics

October 5, 2017
(HealthDay)—Researchers say they have identified three criteria that suggest an extremely premature infant has a low risk of developing sepsis, which might allow doctors to spare these babies early exposure to antibiotics.

Got a picky eater? How 'nature and nurture' may be influencing eating behavior in young children

October 3, 2017
For most preschool-age children, picky eating is just a normal part of growing up. But for others, behaviors such as insisting on only eating their favorite food item—think chicken nuggets at every meal—or refusing to ...

Anxious moms may give clues about how anxiety develops

September 27, 2017
Moms may be notorious worriers, but babies of anxious mothers may also spend more time focusing on threats in their environment, according to a team of researchers.

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.