The brain has separate 'fear circuits' for dealing with immediate and distant threats

March 6, 2018, California Institute of Technology
The brain has separate
New research shows for the first time that there are two areas of the brain involved in processing threats, such as an attacking predator. Credit: Flickr user jinterwas

Imagine walking alone at night. Up ahead on the sidewalk, you notice a person lurking in the shadows, and a chill runs down your spine. You pause as you run through your options. Do you turn around and go back the way you came? Cross to the other side of the street? Or do you ignore your fear and keep walking straight ahead?

Now picture another scenario in which you're strolling through a crosswalk. Suddenly, you're startled by the sound of tires screeching and a glimpse of something moving quickly toward you. You leap back just as a car barrels past, barely missing you.

In both scenarios, you are facing a threatening situation, but the threats were very different in nature. Your reactions to each were different as well. In the first situation, the threat was at a distance, giving you time to think strategically. In the second situation, the threat was imminent, and you reacted automatically without conscious thought.

In a paper appearing in the March 6 issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Assistant Professor of Cognitive Neuroscience Dean Mobbs and his co-authors show for the first time that there are two areas of the involved in processing fear. The areas, which they call "fear circuits," split up the responsibility for dealing with threats. Distant threats that allow more time for thinking and strategic behavior are handled by the cognitive-fear circuit, which consists of connections closer to the front of the brain among brain regions called the hippocampus, the , and the ventromedial (an area of the brain responsible for assessing risk and making decisions). Immediate threats requiring a quick response (fight, flight, or freeze) are handled by the reactive-fear circuit, which consists of connections near the center of the brain between two structures known as the periaqueductal gray and the midcingulate cortex.

The research also shows a relationship between the two circuits that Mobbs likens to a seesaw. When activity in one circuit goes up, activity in the other goes down, with the immediacy of the threat determining which way the seesaw tips. That interaction helps the brain react in a way appropriate to the type of threat being faced.

"It's adaptive to shut down some circuits in the brain to evoke others. When the comes closer, you want to shut down the prefrontal cortex," he says. "If there's a tiger in the room, and you're trying to decide whether you should move left or move right, you're going to end up being eaten while you're still thinking about how to best escape."

Credit: California Institute of Technology

Virtual predators

To see activity inside of a person's brain, Mobbs and his fellow researchers used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans. But since there aren't many threats present for a person inside an MRI machine, the researchers developed a "virtual predator" video game that participants played while they were being scanned.

The video game requires players to keep their character (a little triangle) in a particular spot on the screen. The longer players keep their character there, the more money they earn (up to $20). Meanwhile, one of three virtual predators scoots around the screen in preparation to attack the player. During an attack, the predator zooms toward the spot on the screen where the player is earning money. If the predator attacks while the player is still on that spot, all of the money earned that session is lost—and the player receives a mild electric shock to their hand to simulate the physical danger a real predator might present.

Kind of like the ghosts in Pac-Man, each of the predators is a different color and has different attacking abilities. The red predator has a small attack distance, meaning it has to be fairly close to the player's character to initiate an attack. The blue predator, on the other hand, has a large attack distance, giving it the ability to attack from farther away and making it much more dangerous to the player.

Researchers found that when a player was faced with the more dangerous blue predator, activity in their brain's reactive-fear circuit increased, while activity in the cognitive-fear circuit decreased. In contrast, when a player faced the less dangerous red , activity went up in the cognitive-fear circuit, and down in the reactive-fear circuit.

"We need to reconsider the idea that only one brain region is involved in fear," Mobbs says. "This shows that fear is not one thing. It's contextually based, and it can be conscious or subconscious."

Mobbs says the findings will give researchers a better understanding of how the different neural might be going awry in people with panic and anxiety disorders. In turn, that could lead to better treatments for those conditions.

The paper is titled "How Cognitive and Reactive Fear Circuits Optimize Escape Decisions in Humans."

Explore further: Free will takes flight: how our brains respond to an approaching menace

More information: Song Qi et al. How cognitive and reactive fear circuits optimize escape decisions in humans, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2018). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1712314115

Related Stories

Free will takes flight: how our brains respond to an approaching menace

August 23, 2007
Wellcome Trust scientists have identified for the first time how our brain's response changes the closer a threat gets. Using a "Pac Man"-like computer game where a volunteer is pursued by an artificial predator, the researchers ...

Brain sciences researcher pinpoints brain circuit that triggers fear relapse

February 13, 2018
Steve Maren, the Claude H. Everett Jr. '47 Chair of Liberal Arts professor in the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences at Texas A&M University, and his Emotion and Memory Systems Laboratory (EMSL) have made a breakthrough ...

Different brain regions process different types of fear

November 11, 2013
(Medical Xpress)—What do bullies and sex have in common? Based on work by scientists at the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) in Monterotondo, Italy, it seems that the same part of the brain reacts to both. In ...

Tarantulas help parse fear in the human brain

November 9, 2010
The human brain may respond differently to threats based on proximity, trajectory, and expectations, according to a study published this week in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Brain circuit enables split-second decisions when cues conflict

April 24, 2017
When animals hunt or forage for food, they must constantly weigh whether the chance of a meal is worth the risk of being spotted by a predator. The same conflict between cost and benefit is at the heart of many of the decisions ...

Tracing the scent of fear: Study identifies neurons, brain region involved in rodent stress response

March 21, 2016
The odor of bobcat urine, if you ever get a chance to take a whiff, is unforgettable—like rotten meat combined with sweat, with something indescribably feral underlying it. To humans, it's just nose-wrinklingly disgusting.

Recommended for you

Use of electrical brain stimulation to foster creativity has sweeping implications

September 18, 2018
What is creativity, and can it be enhanced—safely—in a person who needs a boost of imagination? Georgetown experts debate the growing use of electrical devices that stimulate brain tissue, and conclude there is potential ...

Engineers decode conversations in brain's motor cortex

September 18, 2018
How does your brain talk with your arm? The body doesn't use English, or any other spoken language. Biomedical engineers are developing methods for decoding the conversation, by analyzing electrical patterns in the motor ...

Team identifies brain's lymphatic vessels as new avenue to treat multiple sclerosis

September 17, 2018
Lymphatic vessels that clean the brain of harmful material play a crucial role in the development and progression of multiple sclerosis, new research from the University of Virginia School of Medicine suggests. The vessels ...

Circuit found for brain's statistical inference about motion

September 17, 2018
As the eye tracks a bird flying past, the muscles that pan the eyeballs to keep the target in focus set their pace not only on the speed they see, but also on a reasonable estimate of the speed they expect from having watched ...

Mouse study reveals that activity, not rest, speeds recovery after brain injury

September 17, 2018
When recovering from a brain injury, getting back in the swing of things may be more effective than a prolonged period of rest, according to a new Columbia study in mice. These findings offer a compelling example of the brain's ...

Opioid users could benefit from meth-relapse prevention strategy, study finds

September 17, 2018
New research raises the possibility that a wider group of people battling substance use disorders may benefit from a Scripps Research-developed relapse-prevention compound than previously thought.


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.