Insurance disparities ID'd in diagnosis of late-stage melanoma

Insurance disparities ID'd in diagnosis of late-stage melanoma

For nonelderly adults in the United States, having Medicaid or no health insurance is associated with increased odds of being diagnosed with late-stage melanoma compared with having private insurance, according to a study recently published online in Cancer.

Boya Abudu, M.D., M.P.H., from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston, and colleagues analyzed the National Cancer Data Base for cases of invasive melanoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 among individuals aged 26 to 64 years in a cross-sectional study. The association between status and stage of melanoma at the time of diagnosis was examined for 177,247 cases, while accounting for known risk factors for late-stage diagnosis.

The researchers found that after adjustment for in late-stage diagnosis, compared with individuals with , individuals with Medicaid or no health insurance had 3.12 and 2.21 times greater odds of being diagnosed with late-stage melanoma.

"Future studies into the role of health system factors are warranted to better understand the disparity between insurance types and to improve screening practices for patients with nonprivate health insurance," the authors write.

One author disclosed financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry.


Explore further

Colon cancer survival varies by insurance type

More information: Abstract/Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Journal information: Cancer

Copyright © 2019 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: Insurance disparities ID'd in diagnosis of late-stage melanoma (2019, December 12) retrieved 12 August 2020 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-12-disparities-idd-diagnosis-late-stage-melanoma.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
2 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments