Direct oral anticoagulants associated with lower risk of fracture compared with warfarin for patients with AF

patient
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are associated with lower risk of osteoporotic fracture compared with warfarin for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). No difference was found between DOACs for greater fracture reduction. Findings from a population-based cohort study are published in Annals of Internal Medicine.

Osteoporotic fracture is a known serious complication of anticoagulants among patients with AF. It is unclear whether anticoagulant type is associated with degree of risk.

Researchers from the University of Hong Kong and University College London Strategic Partnership Fund studied an electronic health record database for patients newly diagnosed with AF between 2010 and 2017 who received a new prescription for warfarin or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) (apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban) to compare risk for osteoporotic fracture between anticoagulants. After 24-month follow-up, the data showed that DOAC use was associated with a for fracture than warfarin use. No differences were seen in all -to-head comparisons between DOACs at 24 months.

According to the authors, these findings may help inform the benefit-risk assessment when choosing between anticoagulants.


Explore further

Safety, effectiveness of VKAs, DOACs similar in general practice

More information: Annals of Internal Medicine (2020). http://annals.org/aim/article/doi/10.7326/M19-3671
Journal information: Annals of Internal Medicine

Citation: Direct oral anticoagulants associated with lower risk of fracture compared with warfarin for patients with AF (2020, May 19) retrieved 14 July 2020 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-05-oral-anticoagulants-fracture-warfarin-patients.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
4 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments