Going all the way: Scientists prove that inhaled vaccines offer better protection and immunity than nasal sprays

Going all the way: Scientists prove that inhaled vaccines offer better protection and immunity than nasal sprays
Michael D'Agostino demonstrates the aerosol delivery method, which in this study was done on animal models. Credit: McMaster University

McMaster University scientists who compared respiratory vaccine delivery systems have confirmed that inhaled aerosol vaccines provide far better protection and stronger immunity than nasal sprays.

While nasal sprays reach primarily the nose and throat, inhaled aerosols bypass the nasal passage and deliver vaccine droplets deep in the airway, where they can induce a broad protective , the researchers report.

For the study, published online in the journal Frontiers in Immunology, the researchers used a tuberculosis vaccine to compare delivery methods by measuring the distribution of droplets, immune responses and potency in animals.

When the vaccine was delivered directly into the lungs, it stimulated stronger immune responses, providing much better protection from TB.

"Infections in the tend to be non-severe. In the context of infections caused by viruses like influenza or SARS-CoV-2, it tends to be when the virus gets deep into the lung that it makes you really sick," explains Matthew Miller, a co-author of the study who holds the Canada Research Chair in Viral Pandemics at McMaster University.

"The immune response you generate when you deliver the vaccine deep into the is much stronger than when you only deposit that material in the nose and throat because of the anatomy and nature of the tissue, and the immune cells that are available to respond are very different," says Miller, who is also an investigator with Canada's Global Nexus for Pandemics & Biological Threats, which is based at McMaster.

Going all the way: Scientists prove that inhaled vaccines offer better protection and immunity than nasal sprays
Zhou Xing is co-investigator of the study and a professor at the McMaster Immunology Research Centre and Department of Medicine. Credit: McMaster University

"This study for the first time provides strong preclinical evidence to support the development of inhaled aerosol delivery over nasal spray for human vaccination against respiratory infections including TB, COVID-19 and influenza," says Zhou Xing, co-investigator of the study and a professor at the McMaster Immunology Research Centre and Department of Medicine.

More than 6.3 million have people died during the COVID-19 pandemic, and respiratory infections remain a significant cause of illness and death throughout the world, driving an urgent and renewed worldwide effort to develop vaccines that can be delivered directly to the mucous lining of the respiratory tract.

Scientists at McMaster, who have developed a unique inhaled form of COVID vaccine, believe this deep-delivery method offers the best defense against the current and future pandemics.

A Phase 1 clinical trial is currently under way to evaluate the inhaled aerosol vaccine in healthy adults who had previously received two or three doses of an injected COVID mRNA vaccine.

Nasal mist flu vaccines have been shown to be highly effective in children, but much less effective in adults, leaving injectable flu vaccines as the most popular choice for seasonal flu vaccinations.

Previous research by the McMaster team has shown that in addition to being needle-free and painless, an inhaled vaccine is so efficient at targeting the lungs and upper airways that it can achieve maximum protection with a much smaller dose than injected vaccines.


Explore further

Newly developed inhaled vaccine delivers broad protection against SARS-CoV-2, variants

Journal information: Frontiers in Immunology

Citation: Going all the way: Scientists prove that inhaled vaccines offer better protection and immunity than nasal sprays (2022, June 10) retrieved 7 August 2022 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2022-06-scientists-inhaled-vaccines-immunity-nasal.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
1536 shares

Feedback to editors