This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

peer-reviewed publication

trusted source

proofread

Coronary CTA for acute chest pain emergencies: Single- vs. dual-source scanners

Coronary CTA for acute chest pain emergencies: Single- vs. dual-source scanners
Patient underwent coronary CTA using 64-detector row SSCT scanner, with heart rate control. Mean heart rate during acquisition was 89 bpm. Curved MPR images of right coronal artery (A), left anterior descending coronary artery (B), and left circumflex coronary artery (C) show poor image quality. Severe motion artifact is present in distal segments of RCA and LCX, and additional artifact from chest wall movement is present in proximal portion of left main coronary artery, leading to nondiagnostic examination. CT completion time was 236 minutes, disposition time was 79 minutes, and ED LOS was 601 minutes. Patient was discharged from ED without cardiology consultation, and did not undergo invasive coronary angiography or revascularization, nor experienced 30-day all-cause mortality or major adverse cardiovascular event. Credit: ARRS/AJR

According to a study published in the American Journal of Roentgenology, using a dual-source CT (DSCT) scanner for coronary CTA can facilitate clinical processes by eliminating the need to administer beta-blockers for heart rate control while decreasing nondiagnostic examinations.

"The findings indicate the potential role of a DSCT scanner with high temporal resolution to help expedite clinical processes in the (ED) setting," concluded corresponding author Young Joo Suh, MD, Ph.D., from Korea's Research Institute of Radiological Science at the Center for Clinical Imaging Data in Seoul.

The manuscript included 509 (mean age, 52.1 years; 283 men, 226 women) at low-to-intermediate risk for who underwent coronary CTA for acute chest pain in a single ED during the off hours of March 1, 2020 to April 25, 2022. A total 205 patients initially underwent CTA using a 64-detector single-source CT (SSCT) with heart rate control—oral beta-blocker administration if heart rate was faster than 65 beats per minute.

Following scanner replacement on April 26, 2021, 304 patients underwent CTA using a third-generation DSCT without heart rate control. Cohorts were compared via length of stay (LOS) in the ED, as well as CT completion time (i.e., from ordering CTA to complete acquisition). Additional endpoints for Suh et al. included and nondiagnostic examinations based on radiology reports.

Ultimately, DSCT without heart rate control—compared to SSCT with control—showed no difference in ED LOS (505 vs. 457 minutes; p=.37), but shorter CT completion time (95 vs. 117 minutes; p<.001), lower frequency of nondiagnostic examinations (1.6% vs. 6.3%, p=.01), and no difference in cardiology consultation, angiography, disposition, or revascularization (p>.05).

Noting an array of factors, especially patient disposition and onboarding processes, can affect overall length of stay, "the reduction in CT completion time through use of the DSCT system can still provide overall benefit in the ED setting," the authors added.

More information: Ji Hoon Kim et al, Coronary CTA for Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department: Comparison of 64-Detector Row Single-Source and Third-Generation Dual-Source Scanners, American Journal of Roentgenology (2023). DOI: 10.2214/AJR.22.28963

Citation: Coronary CTA for acute chest pain emergencies: Single- vs. dual-source scanners (2023, March 1) retrieved 4 May 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-03-coronary-cta-acute-chest-pain.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Hospital visit for chest pain not always necessary

3 shares

Feedback to editors