This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

preprint

trusted source

proofread

New COVID vaccine induces good antibody response to mutated viral variants, finds study

vaccination
Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

Researchers at Karolinska Institutet and Danderyd Hospital have followed recipients of the new updated COVID-19 vaccine and analyzed the antibody response to different SARS-CoV-2 variants. The results show a surprisingly strong response to the now dominant and highly mutated omicron variants.

The ongoing COMMUNITY study, which was launched in the spring of 2020 with the regular testing of 2,149 members of the Danderyd Hospital staff, has recently published the results of this autumn's leg of the study.

Twenty-four participants were recorded in this study, the majority of whom were over 64 and had received four or five previous doses. The article has been accepted for publication in the journal The Lancet Infectious Diseases, and is accessible prior to publication on the pre-print server, bioRxiv.

Exclusively targets omicron

Previous updates of the COVID-19 vaccine have included both the original SARS-CoV-2 variant and . However, they triggered a much stronger antibody response to the former than to the latter. Omicron variants are now globally dominant, and the sharp rise in the omicron XBB variant and its sub-variants prompted the development of vaccines for these strains. However, other variants have since taken over, among them the highly mutated BA.2.86, and scientists have been uncertain if the new vaccine protects against these as well.

The results of this study now show that the updated COVID-19 vaccine gives a 10-fold increase in antibodies against not only XBB but also newer and more mutated strains, such as BA.2.86.

"It's good to see that the new updated vaccine induces such a broad antibody response," says Charlotte Thålin, researcher at Karolinska Institutet, the Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, M.D. at Danderyd Hospital and head researcher of the COMMUNITY study upon which the results are based.

"Previous updates have not managed to shift the response towards omicron and the new variants, since they have been adapted to the original virus. The broad response we're seeing now is likely due to the fact that the new vaccine only targets omicron, which differs greatly from the original virus."

Unexpectedly effective

"We're seeing a sharper rise than we'd been hoping for in the neutralizing antibodies against all the new variants we'd tested," says the paper's first author Ulrika Marking, doctoral student at Karolinska Institutet, the Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital.

"This strongly suggests that the new vaccine also provides cross-protection against the new variants and corroborates the recommendation that and people in the risk group for influenza and COVID-19 should get vaccinated."

The COMMUNITY study is being run as a collaboration among Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, the Swedish Public Health Agency, Uppsala University and SciLifeLab.

Small changes in the scientific article may be made before final publication in The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

More information: Ulrika Marking et al, Humoral immune responses to the monovalent XBB.1.5-adapted BNT162b2 mRNA booster, bioRxiv (2023). DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.21.572575

Journal information: bioRxiv
Citation: New COVID vaccine induces good antibody response to mutated viral variants, finds study (2023, December 22) retrieved 28 April 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-12-covid-vaccine-good-antibody-response.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

New findings may explain why mRNA vaccines provide limited protection against omicron

116 shares

Feedback to editors