Sharp or flat: Gene clues into musical ability

DNA goes only part-way to explaining musical ability, researchers say

Music surfaces frequently in the great Nature vs. Nurture debate: Why can someone be a virtuoso pianist yet their neighbour be a musical duffer? Does the answer lie in genes or upbringing?

In a study published on Tuesday that compared hundreds of individuals, scientists said the first step towards answering the question may lie in DNA—in several genes that detect and interpret sounds.

Researchers took blood samples from 767 people from 76 families, ranging in age from seven to 94 years. Some families had a strong musical tradition, boasting several professional players.

The scientists unravelled the genetic code from the samples and carried out a comparison between the volunteers, looking for variants in their DNA.

They also asked the volunteers to do three musical tests. The guinea pigs were asked to distinguish between notes that had slightly different tones and durations, and to identify sequences of notes that were subtly different from each other.

Among those who performed well in these tests, the big standout was tiny but significant differences in several located on Chromosome 4 which help determine how we hear and perceive sound.

One variant lies on a gene called GATA2, which is important for the hair cells in the inner ear. The delicate fibres on these cells move in response to different frequencies and transmit a signal through the auditory nerve to the brain.

Another telltale variant was found in a gene called PCDH7, which plays an important role in a part of the brain called the amygdala—believed to be the driver for how we transform sounds into patterns.

These are only a few of what is likely to be a bigger gene haul, but in any case DNA goes only part-way to explaining , the authors said.

According to a common theory, has a "primary" component—the physical ability to distinguish tones and sequences—and this is a prerequisite to a "secondary" component, the skill to play, which is dependent on one's culture and environment.

"Musical aptitude is a complex behavioural trait," the paper said, stressing that their experiments "account for only a part" of it.

"Environmental factors, such as the childhood musical environment, the example set by parents and siblings, and music education affect musical abilities," it added.

Their study, published in the journal Molecular Psychiatry, did not look at musical creativity—the ability to compose.

More information: The study (A genome-wide linkage and association study of musical aptitude identifies genetic loci containing variants related to inner-ear development and neurocognitive functions) was published in Molecular Psychiatry on 24 February 2014.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Musical aptitude relates to reading ability

Oct 17, 2011

Auditory working memory and attention, for example the ability to hear and then remember instructions while completing a task, are a necessary part of musical ability. But musical ability is also related to verbal memory ...

Picking up mistakes

Sep 30, 2013

(Medical Xpress)—Musicians have sharper minds are able to pick up mistakes and fix them quicker than the rest of us, according to new research.

Recommended for you

Link seen between seizures and migraines in the brain

11 hours ago

Seizures and migraines have always been considered separate physiological events in the brain, but now a team of engineers and neuroscientists looking at the brain from a physics viewpoint discovered a link ...

Neuroscience: Why scratching makes you itch more

17 hours ago

Turns out your mom was right: Scratching an itch only makes it worse. New research from scientists at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis indicates that scratching causes the brain to release ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

russell_russell
not rated yet Mar 12, 2014
"According to a common theory, musical aptitude has a "primary" component—the physical ability to distinguish tones and sequences."

If born deaf, then "the physical ability to distinguish tones and sequences" is not lacking.

If eyesight is normal, then viewing any keyboard is "the physical ability to distinguish tones and sequences"

Any visual stimuli can substitute for the ability to "physically" hear. Color, notes, keyboards, etc.
Any visual representation of music will suffice to compose music as well, without ever having to experience sound at all.

This is the "map" vs. "territory" difference.

Where one's makes a "distinction" using a map (any representation of sound) or territory (hearing) is in the mind. That has nothing to do with the "physical ability" as "common theory" will have you to believe.

Too bad.
And the fallacy continues...



Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.