How antioxidants can accelerate cancers, and why they don't protect against them

Drs. Tuveson and Chandel explain why eating foods rich in antioxidants, as well as taking antioxidant supplements, can actually promote cancer, rather than fight or prevent it, as conventional wisdom suggests. Credit: CSHL

For decades, health-conscious people around the globe have taken antioxidant supplements and eaten foods rich in antioxidants, figuring this was one of the paths to good health and a long life.

Yet clinical trials of have repeatedly dashed the hopes of consumers who take them hoping to reduce their cancer risk. Virtually all such trials have failed to show any protective effect against cancer. In fact, in several trials antioxidant supplementation has been linked with increased rates of certain cancers. In one trial, smokers taking extra beta carotene had higher, not lower, rates of lung cancer.

In a brief paper appearing today in The New England Journal of Medicine, David Tuveson, M.D. Ph.D., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Professor and Director of Research for the Lustgarten Foundation, and Navdeep S. Chandel, Ph.D., of the Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University, propose why antioxidant supplements might not be working to reduce cancer development, and why they may actually do more harm than good.

Their insights are based on recent advances in the understanding of the system in our that establishes a natural balance between oxidizing and anti-oxidizing compounds. These compounds are involved in so-called redox (reduction and oxidation) reactions essential to cellular chemistry.

Oxidants like are essential in small quantities and are manufactured within cells. There is no dispute that oxidants are toxic in large amounts, and cells naturally generate their own anti-oxidants to neutralize them. It has seemed logical to many, therefore, to boost intake of to counter the effects of hydrogen peroxide and other similarly toxic "reactive oxygen species," or ROS, as they are called by scientists. All the more because it is known that generate of ROS to help feed their abnormal growth.

Drs. Tuveson and Chandel propose that taking antioxidant pills or eating vast quantities of foods rich in antioxidants may be failing to show a beneficial effect against cancer because they do not act at the critical site in cells where tumor-promoting ROS are produced – at cellular energy factories called mitochondria. Rather, supplements and dietary antioxidants tend to accumulate at scattered distant sites in the cell, "leaving tumor-promoting ROS relatively unperturbed," the researchers say.

Quantities of both ROS and natural antioxidants are higher in cancer cells – the paradoxically higher levels of antioxidants being a natural defense by cancer cells to keep their higher levels of oxidants in check, so growth can continue. In fact, say Tuveson and Chandel, therapies that raise the levels of oxidants in cells may be beneficial, whereas those that act as antioxidants may further stimulate the cancer cells. Interestingly, radiation therapy kills cancer cells by dramatically raising levels of oxidants. The same is true of chemotherapeutic drugs – they kill via oxidation.

Paradoxically, then, the authors suggest that "genetic or pharmacologic inhibition of antioxidant proteins" – a concept tested successfully in rodent models of lung and pancreatic cancers—may be a useful therapeutic approach in humans. The key challenge, they say, is to identify antioxidant proteins and pathways in cells that are used only by cancer cells and not by . Impeding antioxidant production in healthy cells will upset the delicate redox balance upon which normal cellular function depends.

The authors propose new research to profile antioxidant pathways in tumor and adjacent normal cells, to identify possible therapeutic targets.

More information: "The Promise and Perils of Antioxidants for Cancer Patients" appears in The New England Journal of Medicine on July 10, 2014.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

A novel disease-preventing antioxidant pathway

May 27, 2014

Interested in antioxidants? They protect us against aging and cancer. It's one of the reasons we like our green tea and even our broccoli. But there is a new kid on the antioxidant block - uric acid. But wait, you're thinking, ...

Unconventional view of type 2 diabetes causation proposed

Feb 27, 2014

At 85, Nobel laureate James D. Watson, the co-discoverer of the double-helix structure of DNA, continues to advance intriguing scientific ideas. His latest, a hypothesis on the causation of type 2 diabetes, is to appear 7 ...

Recommended for you

A better way to track emerging cell therapies using MRIs

15 hours ago

Cellular therapeutics – using intact cells to treat and cure disease – is a hugely promising new approach in medicine but it is hindered by the inability of doctors and scientists to effectively track the movements, destination ...

New biomedical implants accelerate bone healing

22 hours ago

A major success in developing new biomedical implants with the ability to accelerate bone healing has been reported by a group of scientists from the Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Malaya. ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

zorro6204
5 / 5 (7) Jul 10, 2014
Oh well, screw it, I'm just eating bacon then.
skills4u
5 / 5 (1) Jul 10, 2014
Oh well, screw it, I'm just eating bacon then.

LOL !, well done and in moderation & you'll be fine ! Did you read the study where it's now good for you to eat lean beef as your main protein source ?
dbsi
5 / 5 (1) Jul 12, 2014
This is like black and white when colors are important. What is the role of antioxidants and oxidants in a cell progressing in to a concerous state? What is it during other phases of cancer progression?
Newbeak
1 / 5 (1) Jul 13, 2014
I read that DNA co-discoverer James Watson has this view as well: http://www.telegr...ins.html
Lex Talonis
not rated yet Jul 16, 2014
Arseholes - it's ANTI- OXIDANT ---- suppliments----

And only in some cases......

So fuck them - eat well. live long, and cure cancer.
OneOfMany
not rated yet Aug 02, 2014
"In one trial, smokers taking extra beta carotene had higher, not lower, rates of lung cancer."
If i remember correctly, they were taking artificial beta carotene and not natural one.
So that study only confirmed that artificial beta carotene is problematic, not beta caroten in general...