Taking painkillers increases death risk, second heart attacks in survivors

September 10, 2012

Heart attack survivors who take common painkillers after a heart attack have a higher long-term risk of dying or having a second heart attack, according to a new study published in Circulation, an American Heart Association journal.

The , known as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), include over-the-counter medicines such as ibuprofen and and such as (celecoxib), which is used to treat conditions including arthritis.

"It is important to get the message out to clinicians taking care of patients with cardiovascular disease that NSAIDs are harmful, even several years after a ," said Anne-Marie Schjerning Olsen, M.D., the study's lead author and a fellow in the cardiology department at Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte in Denmark.

Schjerning Olsen and her colleagues used national hospital and pharmacy registries in Denmark to identify almost 100,000 people 30 or older who had a first heart attack between 1997 and 2009, and to see if they were prescribed NSAIDs afterwards.

Forty-four percent of the patients filled at least one NSAID prescription. Among those receiving an NSAID, risk of death from any cause was 59 percent higher one year after their heart attack, and 63 percent higher after five years.

Similarly, risk of having another heart attack or dying from was 30 percent higher one year later and 41 percent higher after five years. The findings considered other illnesses and medication use in the NSAID patients, as well as differences in age, sex, income and year of hospitalization.

"The results support previous findings suggesting that NSAIDs have no apparent safe treatment window among , and show that coronary risk related to using the drugs remains high, regardless of the time that has passed since the heart attack," Schjerning Olsen said.

Normally, patients who have a heart attack face higher risk of death or another heart attack within the first year. But the extra risk is gone within five to 10 years.

Because the new study instead showed a persistently higher risk over at least five years for patients on the drugs, "long-term caution with any use of NSAIDS is advised in all patients after heart attack," Schjerning Olsen said.

A 2007 statement urged doctors to carefully weigh risks versus benefits when considering NSAID use in patients with a history or high risk of cardiovascular disease.

These data showed no difference in risk for men versus women. Because researchers used nationwide data, the findings extend across races, age, income groups and hospitals.

Researchers didn't test the drugs' effects in a controlled clinical trial, so the study didn't definitely show that NSAIDs, rather than other unknown factors, cause additional deaths or heart attacks. But the researchers consider NSAIDs the likely culprit behind the higher risk.

Use of should be limited and their over-the-counter availability should be re-evaluated, Schjerning Olsen said.

"Allowing a drug to be sold without prescription must be perceived by the general public as a strong signal of safety, and may be contrary in this case," she said.

Explore further: Short term use of painkillers could be dangerous to heart patients

Related Stories

Short term use of painkillers could be dangerous to heart patients

May 9, 2011
Even short-term use of some painkillers could be dangerous for people who've had a heart attack, according to research published in Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association.

Study strengthens concerns about long-term use of certain painkillers

July 22, 2011
(Medical Xpress) -- Painkillers such as ibuprofen, naxopren and celecoxib provide needed relief for many patients who have chronic pain. But an ongoing source of contention is whether those drugs and others in their class ...

Common painkillers linked to irregular heart rhythm: study

July 4, 2011
Commonly used painkillers to treat inflammation are linked to an increased risk of irregular heart rhythm (known as atrial fibrillation or flutter), concludes a study published in the British Medical Journal today.

Recommended for you

Five vascular diseases linked to one common genetic variant

July 27, 2017
Genome-wide association studies have implicated a common genetic variant in chromosome 6p24 in coronary artery disease, as well as four other vascular diseases: migraine headache, cervical artery dissection, fibromuscular ...

Could aggressive blood pressure treatments lead to kidney damage?

July 18, 2017
Aggressive combination treatments for high blood pressure that are intended to protect the kidneys may actually be damaging the organs, new research from the University of Virginia School of Medicine suggests.

Quantifying effectiveness of treatment for irregular heartbeat

July 17, 2017
In a small proof-of-concept study, researchers at Johns Hopkins report a complex mathematical method to measure electrical communications within the heart can successfully predict the effectiveness of catheter ablation, the ...

Concerns over side effects of statins stopping stroke survivors taking medication

July 17, 2017
Negative media coverage of the side effects associated with taking statins, and patients' own experiences of taking the drugs, are among the reasons cited by stroke survivors and their carers for stopping taking potentially ...

Study discovers anticoagulant drugs are being prescribed against safety advice

July 17, 2017
A study by researchers at the University of Birmingham has shown that GPs are prescribing anticoagulants to patients with an irregular heartbeat against official safety advice.

Protein may protect against heart attack

July 14, 2017
DDK3 could be used as a new therapy to stop the build-up of fatty material inside the arteries

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Smashin_Z_1885
3.7 / 5 (3) Sep 10, 2012
Note that Cannabis (marijuana) is also a painkiller, yet, it causes no harm to the human body. Further, it has already been known that synthetic pharmaceuticals are dangerous to human health, so this article is really nothing new. It has been know, however, that Cannabis has been in use for over 4500 years, with no adverse health effects. In fact, it is beneficial to overall health. Is it not clear, then, why synthetic drugs, while dangerous, are perfectly legal, yet, a natural herb such as cannabis is illegal in most countries?
Smashin_Z_1885
3 / 5 (2) Sep 11, 2012
Some argue that indeed, Cannabis is an effective analgesic pain reliever, but, the side effect is that the user will 'get high', or may 'become hungry' (the munchies). I'd say those side effects are quite benign compared to destroying your heart and arteries with Nsaids.
Smashin_Z_1885
1 / 5 (1) Sep 11, 2012
Cannabis, right now, could replace the following synthetic drugs: 1) Nsaids, and all other similar drugs such as aspirin and tylenol, 2) Broncho-dialaters (asthma inhalers), 3) arthritis medications of all types (weed cures it in a two-fold fashion: a) powerful anti-inflammatory, and b) stops the immune system from attacking the bodies own joint tissues, 4) Nicotine and alcohol addiction (weed causes changes in the brain (while high), that inhibit the cravings for nicotine and alcohol; therefore, continuous low-dosing of weed can easily stop nicotine and alcohol cravings.
Smashin_Z_1885
3 / 5 (2) Sep 11, 2012
In the 1880's, you could buy cannabis tonics at the drug store legally. Also, various type of candy were available, as well as plain old weed in it's natural form (for smoking or use in food). We knew the value of it for so many ailments, and still do.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.