Theta brainwaves reflect ability to beat built-in bias

May 7, 2013
EEG readings of theta brainwaves in the prefrontal cortex allowed researchers to correlate levels of brain activity with success in overcoming innate 'Pavlovian' biases. Credit: Jim Cavanagh/Michael Frank

Vertebrates are predisposed to act to gain rewards, and to lay low to avoid punishment. Try to teach chickens to back away from food in order to obtain it, and you'll fail, as researchers did in 1986. But (some) humans are better thinkers than chickens. In the May 8 edition of the Journal of Neuroscience, researchers show that the level of theta brainwave activity in the prefrontal cortex predicts whether people will be able to overcome these ingrained biases when doing so is required to achieve a goal.

The study helps explain a distinctly human mechanism of cognition, said the lead researchers at Brown University, and could be applied to studying and treating reward-seeking or punishment-avoidance conditions such as addiction or obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Despite how we've evolved, life doesn't always encourage acting to gain reward or freezing to avoid punishment. Sometimes we must restrain ourselves to gain a reward (baseball batters can get on base by not swinging at bad pitches), or take action to avoid a penalty (tax cheats can come forward during amnesties). Acting counter to our ingrained "Pavlovian" is a matter of the brain recognizing the conflict between the rational course of action and the instinct.

"We have suggested that more advanced brain mechanisms in the prefrontal are needed to exert over behavior in these circumstances," said Michael Frank, the paper's senior author and an Associate Professor of Cognitive, Linguistic and at Brown. "This study provides evidence that temporally-specific brain activity within the prefrontal cortex is related to this ability, both between and within individuals."

Human vs. bias

That brain activity could be measured and quantified as theta brainwaves. Brown James Cavanagh led the research in which he recruited 34 people to play a custom-designed while wearing scalp monitors.

The game involved four scenarios, all reinforced by putting a little real money on the line: the instinctual scenarios of clicking for a reward, and not clicking to avoid a penalty; and the trickier scenarios of clicking to avoid penalty and not clicking to gain a reward.

Over many rounds, players tried to learn what to do when presented with one of four distinct symbols, each of which corresponded to a different scenario.

Cavanagh programmed the scenarios to usually, but not always, reward the proper behavior. For this reason, people had to pay attention to what was likely, rather than merely memorize a simple, reliable pattern.

Cavanagh and his co-authors measured how well people learned the proper action for each scenario. With the advantage of instinct, almost everyone learned to click for a reward. Most people also managed to learn to not click to avoid penalty, and even managed in similar numbers to click to avoid penalty. Like the chickens, however, significantly fewer people could restrain themselves in order to gain a reward.

Those who were bad at overcoming one Pavlovian bias were much more likely to fail at the other.

While the subjects were playing the game, the experimenters also measured theta brainwave activity in each subject's , for instance at the exact moment they saw the distinct symbols of the tasks.

The main idea of the study was to correlate the subjects' theta brain activity during the tasks with their ability to overcome ingrained bias when appropriate. Sure enough, the subject's ability to repress Pavlovian bias was predicted by the enhancement of theta during the trials when the bias was unwanted, compared to when it provided proper guidance.

"Some people are really good at it, and some are not, and we were able to predict that from their ," Cavanagh said.

This was not only true when comparing individual subjects, but also when comparing the subjects to themselves at different times (e.g. some subjects' abilities wavered from task to task and the theta varied right along with that).

Many psychological factors could have confounded the results – differential sensitivity to gains and losses, for example – but Cavanagh and Frank controlled for those with the help of a sophisticated computer model that accounts for, and statistically disentangles, the relationship of bias and theta from those other influences.

Our better nature

All of the study subjects were screened to ensure they were psychiatrically healthy. In these subjects, the study results not only confirmed that people harbor the ingrained biases, but differ in their ability to overcome them. Frank said the variations likely come from innate and situational factors. Evidence suggests that the degree of ingrained bias may have genetic and neurological roots, he said, but can also vary within the same individual based on factors such as fatigue or stress.

For people with psychiatric disorders, Cavanagh said, the predictive value of measurable theta activity for behavioral patterns could become an important tool for diagnosis and predicting treatment outcomes.

Frank, who is affiliated with the Brown Institute for Brain Science, added that the lab has begun studying whether people can improve behavior by purposely modulating theta activity. If so, that could lead to a therapy for addiction.

"We are beginning studies that allow us to safely manipulate activity in specific frequencies like theta in the frontal cortex which will allow us to assess the causal role these signals may be playing," he said.

It's not easy to work against primal intuition, but people have the ability and now researchers know how that's reflected in brains.

"This tells us a lot about the neurobiology of why we're special," Cavanagh said.

Explore further: Deep brain stimulation studies show how brain buys time for tough choices

Related Stories

Deep brain stimulation studies show how brain buys time for tough choices

September 25, 2011
Take your time. Hold your horses. Sleep on it. When people must decide between arguably equal choices, they need time to deliberate. In the case of people undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease, that ...

In the brain, winning is everywhere

October 5, 2011
Winning may not be the only thing, but the human brain devotes a lot of resources to the outcome of games, a new study by Yale researchers suggest.

Gray matter in brain's control center linked to ability to process reward

November 29, 2011
The more gray matter you have in the decision-making, thought-processing part of your brain, the better your ability to evaluate rewards and consequences. That may seem like an obvious conclusion, but a new study conducted ...

Study links hippocampus with unconscious bias

October 12, 2012
(Medical Xpress)—A new US study into brain function has found links between preferences and the regions of the brain involved in connecting new memories to old ones. The associations formed provide shortcuts the subconscious ...

Recommended for you

Researchers find monkey brain structure that decides if viewed objects are new or unidentified

August 18, 2017
A team of researchers working at the University of Tokyo School of Medicine has found what they believe is the part of the monkey brain that decides if something that is being viewed is recognizable. In their paper published ...

Artificial neural networks decode brain activity during performed and imagined movements

August 18, 2017
Artificial intelligence has far outpaced human intelligence in certain tasks. Several groups from the Freiburg excellence cluster BrainLinks-BrainTools led by neuroscientist private lecturer Dr. Tonio Ball are showing how ...

Study of nervous system cells can help to understand degenerative diseases

August 18, 2017
The results of a new study show that many of the genes expressed by microglia differ between humans and mice, which are frequently used as animal models in research on Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative disorders.

How whip-like cell appendages promote bodily fluid flow

August 18, 2017
Researchers at Nagoya University have identified a molecule that enables cell appendages called cilia to beat in a coordinated way to drive the flow of fluid around the brain; this prevents the accumulation of this fluid, ...

Researchers make surprising discovery about how neurons talk to each other

August 17, 2017
Researchers at the University of Pittsburgh have uncovered the mechanism by which neurons keep up with the demands of repeatedly sending signals to other neurons. The new findings, made in fruit flies and mice, challenge ...

Neurons involved in learning, memory preservation less stable, more flexible than once thought

August 17, 2017
The human brain has a region of cells responsible for linking sensory cues to actions and behaviors and cataloging the link as a memory. Cells that form these links have been deemed highly stable and fixed.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.3 / 5 (3) May 07, 2013
'theta waves'. this , and all 'conclusory' mri research with conclusions about specific behavior linked to the motion of blood in the brain will one day be considered the phrenology of the 20th and 21st century.

what bunk. research about random ass correlation masquerading itself as causation testing. it is beyond crap science, it is crap science selling itself as not crap. it's deceptive crap. like eating horsemeat.
1 / 5 (1) May 08, 2013
'theta waves'. this , and all 'conclusory' mri research with conclusions about specific behavior linked to the motion of blood in the brain will one day be considered the phrenology of the 20th and 21st century.

what bunk. research about random ass correlation masquerading itself as causation testing. it is beyond crap science, it is crap science selling itself as not crap. it's deceptive crap. like eating horsemeat.

I will have to disagree with you on that. This is a study of effect not the cause. It is preliminary research to a very mysterious and complex system. Any information helps to build a knowledge base. Yes, in the future this study might be debunked by newer research but it is still a step forward and that is how science works. New knowledge is constantly accumulated and old knowledge is either kept or thrown out based on its merits.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.