A natural history of neurons: Diverse mutations reveal lineage of brain cells

October 1, 2015
neuron
This is a scanning electron micrograph (false color) of a human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neuron. Credit: Thomas Deerinck, UC San Diego

Walt Whitman's famous line, "I am large, I contain multitudes," has gained a new level of biological relevance.

As we grow, our brain cells develop different genomes from one another, according to new research from Harvard Medical School and Boston Children's Hospital.

The study, published Oct. 2 in Science, shows for the first time that in somatic cells—that is, any cell in the body except sperm and eggs—are present in significant numbers in the brains of healthy people. This finding lays the foundation for exploring the role of these post-conception mutations in human development and disease.

"A lot of people have been asking lately whether contribute to a range of neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative diseases, but they couldn't answer the question because of the limitations of technology," said the study's co-senior author, Peter Park, associate professor of biomedical informatics at HMS.

The research team was able to make headway on the problem by combining single-cell genome sequencing with rigorous data analysis techniques.

Already, the researchers have discovered that somatic mutations appear to occur more often in the genes a neuron uses most. They have also been able to trace brain cell lineages based on patterns of mutation.

"These mutations are durable memory for where a cell came from and what it has been up to," said the study's co-senior author, Christopher A. Walsh, the HMS Bullard Professor of Pediatrics and Neurology and chief of the Division of Genetics and Genomics at Boston Children's. "This work is a proof of principle that if we wanted to, and if we had unlimited resources, we could actually decode the whole pattern of development of the human brain."

"I believe this method will also tell us a lot about healthy and unhealthy aging as well as what makes our brains different from those of other animals," Walsh added.

Taking a history

Germline, or inherited, mutations have taken most of the blame for causing diseases and disorders of the brain, including Alzheimer's, autism and schizophrenia. The role of non-inherited mutations in has been murkier. Until recently, scientists didn't even know if they existed in the brain in amounts great enough to matter.

Somatic mutations acquired early in embryogenesis result in the profoundly polyclonal architecture of the mature cortex. Cells that acquire somatic mutations very early in development, for example, blastomeres in the morula (pink, green, blue, or purple) form clones of pluripotent cells, which then segregate into organs derived from all three germ layers (left panel). Within the cerebral cortex, these pre-gastrulation somatic mutations mark spatially adjacent but deeply clonally divergent neurons (right panel). Although clonal dispersion may be restricted tangentially (for example, pink neurons bounded by pink background, inset), closely related neurons are extensively intermingled with neurons that share no clonal connection closer than gastrulation. Cresyl violet stain of human primary somatosensory cortex in right panel is modified from S. Durinck, P. T. Spellman, E. Birney, W. Huber, Mapping identifiers for the integration of genomic datasets with the R/Bioconductor package bioma Rt. Nat Protoc 4, 1184 (2009). Credit: Mollie B. Woodworth

"Single-cell technology was essential for finding them," said Walsh.

Walsh, Park and team studied a particular kind of called single nucleotide variants. Each variant may occur in just a few cells, or even just one, so they can be hard to detect with whole-genome sequencing analyses that average hundreds of thousands of cells. Sequencing individual cells brings the to light.

The downside is that it costs just as much to sequence the genome of one cell as it does to sequence the genome of an entire person. Working within this limitation, the researchers were able to sequence 36 neurons sampled from the cerebral cortices of three deceased people without brain disease, aged 15, 17 and 42.

The researchers found that each neuron contained about 1,500 single nucleotide variants.

For each person, the researchers compared the neurons' genetic sequences to one another and to the individual's heart cells. This allowed them to start figuring out which mutations were shared by which neurons and which could be found elsewhere in the body. They then conducted tests in several parts of the brain to see how many cells in each region carried the same mutations as the neurons they'd sequenced.

Grouping neurons based on their mutations provided clues about cell history, because neurons that shared mutations likely came from the same stem-cell ancestor. If only a few cells shared a mutation, they probably belonged to a lineage that split more recently.

"If a mutation arose very early, it would be present both inside and outside the brain. Or if it arose later, it would be in certain parts of the brain and not others," said Walsh. "We're looking at a record of the series of cell divisions that generated the brain."

Based on patterns of mutation as well as location in the brain, some neurons' lineages could be traced back to a specific day during embryonic development.

Use it and lose it

Many phenomena can create somatic mutations. Ultraviolet light causes them in skin cells. Errors in DNA replication cause them in rapidly dividing cancer .

"What we found in the brain was neither of those things," said Walsh. "We thought the dominant source of mutation would be faulty DNA replication and were surprised to find that instead, it's faulty DNA expression."

Park's data analysis revealed that the genes with the most mutations tended to be the ones that were used most in the brain.

"People like to say about your brain, 'use it or lose it.' Unfortunately, we found there's a certain element of 'use it and lose it,'" said Walsh. "Every time you turn on a gene, there is at least some level of risk."

The findings make the team wonder whether somatic mutations accumulate with age and might contribute to neurodegeneration. They plan to investigate how, when and why these mutations arise in the brain; explore whether having a variety of mutations is damaging or protective; determine if mutation rates vary from person to person; and study additional types of somatic mutations in the brain and other tissues.

As he helps to uncover the role of somatic mutations in the , Park has taken in stride the knowledge that our brains contain a multitude of genetic variation.

"I'm full of mutations but I'm walking around, pretty healthy," said Park. "It just goes to show that there are a lot of things we don't understand."

Explore further: Tracking subtle brain mutations, systematically: Tool can trace and spatially map 'mosaic' mutations in the brain

More information: Somatic mutation in single human neurons tracks developmental and transcriptional history, Science, www.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aab1785

Related Stories

Mutations in cancer often affect the X chromosome

October 18, 2013

Every case of cancer originates from changes in a person's genetic material (mutations). These usually occur as "somatic mutations" in individual cells during an individual's lifetime, rather than being inherited from a person's ...

Recommended for you

How randomness helps cancer cells thrive

March 27, 2017

In a research effort that merged genetics, physics and information theory, a team at the schools of medicine and engineering at The Johns Hopkins University has added significantly to evidence that large regions of the human ...

Fainting disorder mechanism figured out

March 24, 2017

Monash University researchers have discovered the mechanism underlying the fainting disorder, Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS), the condition famously affecting the former lead singer of The Wiggles.

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

JVK
1 / 5 (3) Oct 01, 2015
Journal article: "...somatic mutations in the brain represent a durable and ongoing record of neuronal life history, from development through postmitotic function."

If so, a single nutrient-dependent amino acid substitution would not link life histories transitions in the brain-directed behavior of humans to the life history transitions of morphological and behavioral phenotypes in the honeybee model organism and in white-throated sparrows.

http://link.sprin...4-0895-5 Oppositional COMT Val158Met effects on resting state functional connectivity in adolescents and adults

http://www.pnas.o...abstract Estrogen receptor α polymorphism in a species with alternative behavioral phenotypes

Nutrient-dependent/pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution: a model http://www.ncbi.n...24693353 "...embryonic migration of GnRH neurons to the hypothalamus is controlled by in utero nutrient stress and social stress..."
Vietvet
5 / 5 (2) Oct 02, 2015
Criticisms of the nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled evolutionary model
http://www.ncbi.n...4049134/
JVK
1 / 5 (3) Oct 02, 2015
See also my invited review of nutritional epigenetics.

Nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled ecological adaptations: from atoms to ecosystems
http://figshare.c...s/994281

For comparison, see: Patterns of Protein Evolution in Cytochrome c Oxidase 1 (COI) from the Class Arachnida http://journals.p....0135053

Only one of the two articles links ecological variation to nutrient-dependent ecological adaptations via what is known to serious scientists about physics, chemistry, and the conserved molecular mechanisms of cell type differentiation in all living genera.

The conserved molecular mechanisms do not include proteins that automagically evolve. For example, chromosomal rearrangements do not evolve, despite the claims of PZ Myers or other biologically uninformed science idiots who cite PZ Myers as in Jones' "criticisms."
JVK
1 / 5 (3) Oct 02, 2015
Please join me in thanking Steven Taylor (aka Vietvet) for continuing to represent the world's biologically uninformed science idiots here and everywhere else he has commented on my accurate representations of biologically-based cause and effect.

Few people are as adamant or ignorant. His excuse is lost faith due to war-time trauma, which also sometimes reinforces the beliefs of others in creationist science linked to God. Even when others do not understand creationist science they realize that it attests to the fact that viruses perturb protein folding and that can thus be linked to all pathology in all individuals of all living genera.

For example: Analysis of 6,515 exomes reveals the recent origin of most human protein-coding variants http://dx.doi.org...ure11690

The recent origin of most deleterious mutations in humans attests to what will probably be our virus-induced demise, when we all are overwhelmed by the damage to our DNA that viruses cause.
Captain Stumpy
5 / 5 (2) Oct 02, 2015
on my accurate representations
if your presentations were accurate, there would be no critiques, like this one: http://www.socioa...ew/24367

if you were "accurate", then the scientific community would NOT have published this study: http://rspb.royal...full.pdf

if you had irrefutable evidence that supported your claims, it would be validated, and you would not be pushing creationist religion here, like you do on every thread you post to
His excuse is lost faith due to
WTF does this have to do with Science?
the problem is NOT that Vietvet lost his faith... the problem is that you REFUSE to adhere to the scientific method and you INCLUDE YOUR FAITH in your emo-posts

IOW- it means you post PSEUDOSCIENCE and interpret everything with your RELIGION

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.