Routine antenatal HIV testing cost-effective

Routine antenatal HIV testing cost-effective

(HealthDay)—Routine HIV testing is both cost-effective and cost-saving in antenatal settings, according to a review published online March 2 in the Journal of Clinical Nursing.

Everistus Ibekwe, M.P.H., from Manchester Metropolitan University in the United Kingdom, and colleagues conducted a systematic review of published articles to examine the of routine HIV testing in antenatal settings. Ten articles were eligible and included in the review.

The researchers found that, compared to the alternatives, many programs that involved routine testing for HIV for were cost-effective and cost-saving. Per case of previously undiagnosed maternal HIV-positive infection prevented, the cost savings were between $5,761.20 and $3.69 million. In the various settings there was a strong correlation between cost-effectiveness and the prevalence of HIV.

"Routine HIV testing is both cost-effective and cost-saving compared to the alternatives. However, there are wide variations in the methodological approaches to the studies," the authors write. "Adopting standard reporting format would facilitate comparison between studies and generalizability of economic evaluations."

More information: Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Journal information: Journal of Clinical Nursing

Copyright © 2017 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: Routine antenatal HIV testing cost-effective (2017, March 8) retrieved 12 April 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Chlamydia screening for pregnant young women prevents newborn complications, while saving health dollars


Feedback to editors