Eyes offer a window into the mystery of human consciousness

Eyes offer a window into the mystery of human consciousness
Cortical and thalamic electrophysiology signals in conscious perception. A–C Scalp topographical plots of high-density scalp EEG showing mean voltage (microvolts; µV) for all statistically significant samples by cluster-based permutation tests (p < 0.05) in four time windows corresponding with the event-related potentials (ERPs) N100 (75-125 milliseconds; ms), visual awareness negativity (VAN; 175–225 ms), P2/N2 (275–325 ms), and P3 (350–650 ms) for perceived versus not perceived stimuli in A report, B no-report, and C report versus no-report data. The VAN is present both for report and no-report data, whereas later ERPs, especially N2 and P3 are report-dependent. D Subcortical depth channel locations collapsed onto a coronal slice (−19.9 mm) in MNI brain template space. Red/purple (N = 13) and white bipolar channels (N = 11) distinguish above or below voltage threshold channels, respectively (Fig. S12) (Full details on methods and materials are available in the Supplementary Information). Red channels are with the RNS System (NeuroPace, Inc.) and purple channels with Natus NeuroWorks (Natus, Inc.) depth electrode recordings (Table S2). Neighboring anatomy includes lateral ventricles (LV), third ventricle (3rd V), thalamus (Th), midbrain tegmentum (MT), and pons. Right cortical hemisphere (R) and left cortical hemisphere (L). E Thalamic awareness potential (TAP) and P3 are seen, respectively in thalamic above-threshold contacts and Pz (location on inset) scalp EEG contacts. Mean timecourses show significant differences for perceived versus not perceived stimuli in the ERP analysis for TAP and P3 by cluster-based permutation tests (*p < 0.05) (Full details on methods and materials are available in the Supplementary Information). Stimulus onset was at time = 0 ms. F Peak latencies from stimulus onset for scalp ERPs and TAP. Circles represent individual data (mean channel latencies) and error bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM). Significantly different latencies from TAP found by two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test with Holm–Bonferroni correction (*p < 0.05; N100 versus TAP p = 0.014; VAN versus TAP p = 0.038; N2 versus TAP p = 0.014; P3 versus TAP p = 0.040; all p values are Holm-Bonferroni corrected). A–C Data for report stimuli are from Report Paradigm (N = 57) and Report + No-Report Paradigm (N = 65); data for no-report stimuli are from Report + No-Report Paradigm (N = 65). D–F Data are from Report Paradigm in patient participants with thalamic depth electrodes (N = 7). Credit: Nature Communications (2022). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35117-4

Since he was a kid Hal Blumenfeld has wondered about the nature of human consciousness.

"It's what makes us human and makes life worthwhile," said Blumenfeld, now the Mark Loughridge and Michele Williams Professor of Neurology at Yale. "And it's still a mystery of modern science."

In a recent study, Blumenfeld and a team of Yale colleagues identified some of the overlapping neural mechanisms that help to illuminate that mystery.

Writing in the journal Nature Communications, they describe how the is capable of sorting through an avalanche of external stimuli—most of which never reach the —to create a sense of awareness of the individual's surroundings.

"Turns out there is a set of very beautiful and rich activities involved in the neural mechanism of conscious thought," said Blumenfeld, who is also professor of neuroscience and of neurosurgery and director of the Yale Clinical Neuroscience Imaging Center.

One of the challenges facing scientists who study consciousness is the inherent uncertainty that comes with measuring what people are actually aware of. Oftentimes, these researchers will perform imaging on people as they are presented with images of objects or events and are then asked questions, like, "Are you aware of a face?" or "Are you aware of an event?" A key unanswered question, however, is what exactly is being measured? Is it the brain's actual perception of an object or event or simply the response to the question?

To answer this, Blumenfeld—working with Sharif Kronemer, a former Ph.D. student at Yale who is now a postdoctoral fellow at the National Institutes of Health, and a large group of expert collaborators—used a combination of artificial intelligence, mathematics, and a close examination of the eye movements of individuals as they were shown images of people's faces.

As it turns out, they found that important clues are revealed in the eyes. When people were shown clear images, their showed a distinct pattern that indicates they were aware of their surroundings. However, as the subjects were presented with progressively dimmer images of faces, the pattern of eye movement changed. Tracking these changes, Blumenfeld said, allowed researchers to discern whether the subjects actually perceived the face or not without asking them.

"The eyes are truly the window to our souls," he said. "We can tell if people are aware of something by simply looking at their eyes."

The eye-tracking tool allowed researchers to explore the amorphous dividing line between consciousness and unconsciousness, a state most obvious as we awake from sleep. People become progressively more aware of their surroundings as slumber recedes, a process that is controlled in a region of the brain known as the thalamus.

The Yale researchers found that when people awake the thalamus discharges a brief pulse which jumpstarts the transition to consciousness. However, this activity is only a first step in a series of actions throughout the brain that leads to full awareness, they found. For instance, that initial pulse from the thalamus may fail to activate other , keeping the individual unconscious of most surrounding stimuli. However, the pulse can also activate neurons involved in processing in the , which in turn amplifies circuits involved in arousal and attention. At the same time, signals irrelevant to the event are turned off.

Ultimately, the pertinent signals are processed to form a that can be stored in our memory, Blumenfeld said.

Understanding these processes, he said, may help provide new insights into the treatment of some mental health disorders that are marked by a lack of awareness of surroundings—including Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, and traumatic brain injury.

In addition, it may help doctors better assess consciousness in patients who are unable to talk or in a coma.

Blumenfeld hopes these discoveries will also bring humankind closer to understanding ancient philosophical questions about the nature of human consciousness, and the mysteries he's always wondered about.

"Investigating the elegant overlapping signals from deep in the brain to the surface may finally provide a satisfactory explanation for ," he said.

More information: Sharif I. Kronemer et al, Human visual consciousness involves large scale cortical and subcortical networks independent of task report and eye movement activity, Nature Communications (2022). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35117-4

Journal information: Nature Communications
Provided by Yale University
Citation: Eyes offer a window into the mystery of human consciousness (2022, December 8) retrieved 5 March 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2022-12-eyes-window-mystery-human-consciousness.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Researchers find widespread disruption of brain activity during absence seizures


Feedback to editors