Learning left from right

December 21, 2011 By Jonathan Wood in Neuroscience
Learning left from right

Enlarge

Image: Optogenetics meant only the key neurons in the right side of the mouse hippocampus fired. Credit: Olivia Shipton

(Medical Xpress) -- Pop psychology assertions about left-brain/right-brain differences are pretty much tosh. Our personalities are not dominated by a battle between the creative skills residing in one half of the brain competing with the hard reasoning in the other.

But that’s not to say there aren’t any differences between the left and right sides of our brains. There are some anatomical details that differ between the opposite hemispheres of the brain. Language appears to be localised more to networks in the left brain, and differences in the brain can be seen according to whether we are right-handed or left-handed.

Understanding the detail of these left-right differences – how they occur and how they underlie the processing going on in our brains – is tricky, though.

A research group based at Oxford and Cambridge universities led by Professor Ole Paulsen has been using some of the latest, most precise neuroscience techniques to get a handle on this problem.

The scientists studied recently discovered asymmetries among nerve cells involved in and memory processes in the mouse brain. Their findings were published in Nature Neuroscience.

These particular nerve cells, or neurons, are found in the mouse hippocampus, part of the brain intimately involved in memory.

Neurons in one part of the hippocampus have different numbers of brain-chemical-responding proteins according to whether they are contacted by the left or right side of another region of the hippocampus.

The question is whether this finding of a molecular left-brain/right-brain difference is important: does it play any role in learning and memory?

Standard lab techniques for probing neurons and working out what’s going on tend to use electric currents to stimulate the nerves to fire. But such approaches would not be fine enough or accurate enough to pinpoint differences according to whether signals came from the left or right side of the hippocampus.

So the researchers used laser light and gene technology to gain extra control and be able to define exactly which neurons were being stimulated to fire. The technique, known as optogenetics, was pioneered by Professor Gero Miesenböck at Oxford.

"It enables us to be far more precise about which cells are being activated. We really gain control over what’s happening in a cell," explains Oxford DPhil student Olivia Shipton.

Olivia and her colleagues used this approach to stimulate only the key neurons on the left side of the hippocampus, or alternatively only the neurons on the right.

They then measured what this did in the neurons receiving these connections. They reasoned that if the left-right asymmetry in the hippocampus is important, there may be differences according to which side of the brain the signals came from.

They found that signals coming from the left hippocampus led to a strengthening of long-term electrical connections between . This strengthening of connections is a widely accepted model of learning and memory in the .

"It is thought to be associated with how we lay down new memories," says Olivia.

In contrast, there were no such changes with signals coming from the right hippocampus.

"There was a striking difference. It suggests that the left and right hippocampus in the mouse have distinct functions in learning and memory processes," says Olivia.

She adds that it’s possible to speculate that the right hippocampus may provide a constant signal or context against which new learning could be compared through the left side.

The group now want to explore if this functional difference between the left and right sides of the hippocampus is important in guiding the learning of mice.

They believe it should be possible to use the same techniques to control which sides of the hippocampus fire and whether this affects a mouse’s spatial memory as it learns how to navigate mazes.

Provided by Oxford University search and more info website

3.8 /5 (6 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

brodix
Dec 21, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
If the left side of the brain is a serial processor, thus forming logical cause and effect connections, it would make sense that these neural connections grow stronger, as we incorporate information. On the other hand, if the right brain is more of a parallel processor and constantly monitoring non-linear input from the environment, possibly it is better not to form too many pre-conclusions that slow down response time. Thought and reaction being necessarily separate survival techniques.
antialias_physorg
Dec 21, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
If the left side of the brain is a serial processor
...
if the right brain is more of a parallel processor

Is there any basis for these statements?

And anyhow: comparing the brain to processors is not a good analogy on any level.
brodix
Dec 21, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
antialias,
I googled "brain hemisphere serial processor parallel processor" and came up with 65,700 hits.
E.O. Wilson described the insect brain as a thermostat, in that it responds to non-linear environmental input. Possibly we could use that to describe the right side and the left as a clock, since it records serial events, ie. memory. That work?
The brain is an evolved organ, for navigating and surviving potentially hostile environments. If we want to understand and describe its evolution, these are primary functions.
Egleton
Dec 22, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Dr Jill Bolte Taylor describes the difference between the left and Right in this TED talk.
http://www.ted.co...ght.html

Iain McGilcrist writes eloquently about the nuance here.
http://en.wikiped...Emissary

A potted version of his work is found on this TED talk
http://www.ted.co...ain.html
Big revelation. You do not have a brain, you have two.
antialias_physorg
Dec 22, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
I googled "brain hemisphere serial processor parallel processor" and came up with 65,700 hits.

So? I googled the wrong spelling for satellite and came up with 600000 hits. What does that prove?

Yes, it was popular at one time to make analogies between nerve cells and processors. Just like it was popular to draw comparisons between entropy and information. Or humans and machines.

But the more we learn about the brain the less it is like a (computer) processor. That only applies in the loosest sense of the term (a processor then being something that taxes in X and creates some transformed reaction Y)

Possibly we could use that to describe the right side and the left as a clock, since it records serial events, ie. memory.

Processors and clocks invoke a sequential image. The brain is highly parallel, reentrant, and non-linear (e.g. nerve cells react vastly different to the same stimulus beind presented twice in rapid succession - something a processor does not)
brodix
Dec 22, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Antialias,
I certainly agree both analogies are facile and limited. Yes, the brain is an incredibly complex network, but you sounded as though the comparison has something I just dreamed up.
While they are physical networks, they do have both serial and network/non-linear processes, of an organic nature. Does your consciousness form multiple thoughts simultaneously, or generally one at a time? Yes, there is a stew of activity going on in the subconscious, from which interesting connections/insights bubble to the surface. So while it might be a very simplistic description, there are both linear and non-linear processes going on. The evolutionary need is to both sense/analyze the environment and navigate an individual path through it.
Rank 3.8 /5 (6 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • Potential Breakthrough in Seizure Control
    created13 hours ago
  • Popping/Cracked sternum.
    created18 hours ago
  • Which Mental Illness Encompasses This Problem?
    created18 hours ago
  • A question about drug tolerance
    createdMay 23, 2012
  • Poor nutrition leading to overeating?
    createdMay 23, 2012
  • Math and dyslexia?
    createdMay 21, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - Medical Sciences

More news stories

Of mice and mental models: Neuroscientific implications of risk-optimized behavior in the mouse

(Medical Xpress) -- Regardless of an organism’s biological complexity, every encephalized animal continuously makes under-informed behavioral choices that can have serious consequences. Despite its ubiquity, ...

Neuroscience created May 25, 2012 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0 | with audio podcast feature

Persistent sensory experience is good for aging brain

Despite a long-held scientific belief that much of the wiring of the brain is fixed by the time of adolescence, a new study shows that changes in sensory experience can cause massive rewiring of the brain, even as one ages. ...

Neuroscience created May 24, 2012 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Boundary stops molecule right where it needs to be

A molecule responsible for the proper formation of a key portion of the nervous system finds its way to the proper place not because it is actively recruited, but instead because it can't go anywhere else.

Neuroscience created May 24, 2012 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Locating ground zero: How the brain's emergency workers find the disaster area

Like emergency workers rushing to a disaster scene, cells called microglia speed to places where the brain has been injured, to contain the damage by 'eating up' any cellular debris and dead or dying neurons. ...

Neuroscience created May 24, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Genetic 'reset switch' enables signaling pathway to induce multiple developmental outcomes for olfactory neurons

Within the nervous system, a handful of signaling pathways modulate development of a cornucopia of different neuronal subtypes. “Even small alterations in neuron differentiation pathways can disrupt subsequent ...

Neuroscience created May 24, 2012 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0


Travel to high altitudes tied to Crohn's, colitis flare-ups

(HealthDay) -- People with inflammatory bowel disease, which includes Crohn's disease and colitis, may be at increased risk for flare-ups when they fly or travel to high altitudes for skiing or mountain climbing, ...

Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity

(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...

Transvaginal mesh op restores pelvic organ prolapse at price

(HealthDay) -- Transvaginal mesh (TVM) procedures are effective for anatomical restoration of pelvic organ prolapse (POP), but patients report a worsening of sexual function following surgery, according to ...

Tongue analysis software uses ancient Chinese medicine to warn of disease

For 5,000 years, the Chinese have used a system of medicine based on the flow and balance of positive and negative energies in the body. In this system, the appearance of the tongue is one of the measures used to classify ...

Weight struggles? Blame new neurons in your hypothalamus

New nerve cells formed in a select part of the brain could hold considerable sway over how much you eat and consequently weigh, new animal research by Johns Hopkins scientists suggests in a study published in the May issue ...

Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments

A team of scientists at McMaster University has discovered a drug, thioridazine, successfully kills cancer stem cells in the human while avoiding the toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments.