Research shows brain more flexible, trainable than previously thought

March 4, 2012
Brain diagram. Credit:

Opening the door to the development of thought-controlled prosthetic devices to help people with spinal cord injuries, amputations and other impairments, neuroscientists at the University of California, Berkeley, and the Champalimaud Center for the Unknown in Portugal have demonstrated that the brain is more flexible and trainable than previously thought.

Their new study, to be published Sunday, March 4, in the advanced online publication of the journal Nature, shows that through a process called plasticity, can be trained to do something it normally does not do. The same employed in the learning of motor skills, such as riding a bike or driving a car, can be used to master purely , even arbitrary ones.

Over the past decade, tapping into brain waves to control disembodied objects has moved out of the realm of parlor tricks and parapsychology and into the emerging field of neuroprosthetics. This new study advances work by researchers who have been studying the brain circuits used in natural movement in order to mimic them for the development of prosthetic devices.

"What we hope is that our new insights into the brain's wiring will lead to a wider range of better prostheses that feel as close to natural as possible," said Jose Carmena, UC Berkeley associate professor of electrical engineering, and neuroscience. "They suggest that learning to control a BMI (brain-machine interface), which is inherently unnatural, may feel completely normal to a person, because this learning is using the brain's existing built-in circuits for natural motor control."

Carmena and co-lead author Aaron Koralek, a UC Berkeley graduate student in Carmena's lab, collaborated on this study with Rui Costa, co-principal investigator of the study and principal investigator at the Champalimaud Neuroscience Program, and co-lead author Xin Jin, a post-doctoral fellow in Costa's lab.

Previous studies have failed to rule out the role of physical movement when learning to use a prosthetic device.

"This is key for people who can't move," said Carmena, who is also co-director of the UC Berkeley-UCSF Center for Neural Engineering and . "Most brain-machine interface studies have been done in healthy, able-bodied animals. What our study shows is that neuroprosthetic control is possible, even if physical movement is not involved."

To clarify these issues, the scientists set up a clever experiment in which rats could only complete an abstract task if overt physical movement was not involved. The researchers decoupled the role of the targeted motor neurons needed for whisker twitching with the action necessary to get a food reward.

The rats were fitted with a brain-machine interface that converted into auditory tones. To get the food reward – either sugar-water or pellets – the rats had to modulate their thought patterns within a specific brain circuit in order to raise or lower the pitch of the signal.

Auditory feedback was given to the rats so that they learned to associate specific thought patterns with a specific pitch. Over a period of just two weeks, the rats quickly learned that to get food pellets, they would have to create a high-pitched tone, and to get sugar water, they needed to create a low-pitched tone.

If the group of neurons in the task were used for their typical function – whisker twitching – there would be no pitch change to the auditory tone, and no food reward.

"This is something that is not natural for the rats," said Costa. "This tells us that it's possible to craft a prosthesis in ways that do not have to mimic the anatomy of the natural motor system in order to work."

The study was also set up in a way that demonstrated intentional, as opposed to habitual, behavior. The rats were able to vary the amount of pellets or sugar water received based upon their own level of hunger or thirst.

"The rats were aware; they knew that controlling the pitch of the tone was what gave them the reward, so they controlled how much sugar water or how many pellets to take, when to do it, and how to do it in absence of any physical movement," said Costa.

Researchers hope these findings will lead to a new generation of prosthetic devices that feel natural.

"We don't want people to have to think too hard to move a robotic arm with their ," said Carmena.

Explore further: What do animals 'know'? More than you may think

Related Stories

Brain rhythms are key to learning

September 27, 2011

Neuroscientists have long known of the existence of brain waves — rhythmic fluctuations of electrical activity believed to reflect the brain’s state. For example, during rest, brain activity slows down to an alpha ...

Recommended for you

Rat brain atlas provides MR images for stereotaxic surgery

October 21, 2016

Boris Odintsov, senior research scientist at the Biomedical Imaging Center at the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology at the University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign, and Thomas Brozoski, research professor ...

ALS study reveals role of RNA-binding proteins

October 20, 2016

Although only 10 percent of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) cases are hereditary, a significant number of them are caused by mutations that affect proteins that bind RNA, a type of genetic material. University of California ...

Imaging technique maps serotonin activity in living brains

October 20, 2016

Serotonin is a neurotransmitter that's partly responsible for feelings of happiness and for mood regulation in humans. This makes it a common target for antidepressants, which block serotonin from being reabsorbed by neurons ...

Overcoming egocentricity increases self-control

October 19, 2016

Neurobiological models of self-control usually focus on brain mechanisms involved in impulse control and emotion regulation. Recent research at the University of Zurich shows that the mechanism for overcoming egocentricity ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Mar 04, 2012
Interessante notar como os fatores neuroprostéticos da neuroplasticidade se confirmam dia após dia. As discussões sobre isso têm mesmo o intuito de desvendar os processos biológicos, pois sua comprovação é tácita e felizmente imbatível.
not rated yet Mar 04, 2012
not rated yet Mar 04, 2012
Em relação a este artigo e publicado primeiramente por Science News Blog, o pesquisador russo Dmitry Itskov também está nesta linha de pesquisas, bem como o brasileiro Miguel Nicolelis, que pretende que o chute inicial da Copa do Mundo FIFA 2014 seja de alguém que tenha ajudado a recuperar a motricidade do membro inferior a partir de seus sofisticados métodos de neuro-robótica.
not rated yet Mar 04, 2012
Isn't it amazing how the rats can learn to do such tricks?
"so they controlled how much sugar water or how many pellets to take, when to do it, and how to do it in absence of any physical movement,".
not rated yet Mar 05, 2012
Excellent path of inquiry.

You all remember the first time you saw a keyboard. Nothing is more astonishing than seeing hands and fingers being placed on a keyboard and simultaneously hearing sound.

Imagine my surprise when I placed my hands and fingers on a keyboard and no sound was heard. I had no concept of the word "pressure" and no conscious awareness of "pressure" in relationship with the moving objects.

I had no vocabulary for the motor skills of actions associated with the missing word in my vocabulary called "press". I had 'other' associations for 'moving' the keys.

In the beginning all our abilities perform without the labels we assign them later on.

Musical scores sometimes require "unnatural" fingering.
Ability and task can be "natural".

For humans, their imaginations never lead them to venture beyond repetition to bring abilities and tasks together.

The 'closer' the task and ability are 'related', the less repetition of the task is needed to "feel" "natural".

not rated yet Mar 05, 2012
parts of the brain can be trained to do something it normally does not do

Really? Who would have thunk it after all these stroke patients relearning abilities that were situated in the now destroyed parts of their brains. Isn't the plasticity of gray matter like brain-101?

But the conclusion is valid (and important): neural interfaces need not be too specifically tailored to a brain reagion or neuron type in order to acomplish a given task (e.g. move a prosthetic). AND the feedback must not be omitted.
not rated yet Mar 05, 2012

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.