Researchers find lung stem cell, heal lung injury in mice

Researchers find lung stem cell, heal lung injury in mice
An image of an injured mouse lung partially regenerated by injected lung stem cells. The newly regenerated lung tissue is red, and the type-2 alveolar cells are green. Credit: Massimo Nichane

Stanford scientists have found a cell that creates the two different compartments in the mouse lung. They hope their discovery could lead to better therapies for people with lung disease.

A researcher at the School of Medicine and his colleagues have succeeded in isolating mouse lung stem , growing them in large volumes and incorporating them into injured lung tissue in mice.

The work raises hopes for regenerative therapies that could heal currently intractable lung diseases.

A study describing the research was published online Nov. 6 in Nature Methods. Kyle Loh, PhD, an investigator at the Stanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, and Bing Lim, MD, PhD, an investigator at the Genome Institute of Singapore, share senior authorship. The lead author is Massimo Nichane, PhD, currently a research scientist at the Stanford stem cell institute.

The lungs are among the most vital organs of the body. In conjunction with the cardiovascular system, they allow air to travel to every cell and get rid of the waste products of respiration, such as carbon dioxide. For many people with end-stage lung diseases, the only option is lung transplantation.

"Scientists have previously had little success in putting new lung cells into damaged lung to regenerate healthy tissue," Loh said. "We decided to see if we could do that in an animal model."

The researchers started by working to improve on current knowledge of lung stem cells. The lung is divided into two compartments, Loh said: the airway, which allows for passage of air in and out of the lung; and the alveoli, where gases pass in and out of the blood. Other researchers had previously isolated one stem cell for the airway and another stem cell for the alveoli. Loh and his colleagues searched for and found a single lung stem cell that could create cells in both the airway and the alveoli. These multipotent lung stem cells were typified by their display of a protein marker called Sox9.

From one to 100 billion billion

Once they had isolated the stem cells, they were able to make them multiply dramatically. Each mouse lung stem cell that they start started with was able to grow into 100 billion billion lung stem cells over the course of six months. Previously, researchers had not had much success expanding any populations in the laboratory.

Finally, they injected the stem cells into mouse lungs that had been injured by a variety of toxins.  "What we saw was that these repaired the injured tissue and were able to differentiate into the many different kinds of cells that make up the healthy lung," said Nichane.

"Our newfound ability to grow these mouse multipotent lung stem cells in a petri dish in very large numbers, and the cells' ability to regenerate both lung airway and alveolar tissue, constitutes a first step towards future regenerative therapies," Loh said. "Future work will focus on whether analogous multipotent stem cells can be found and cultivated from humans, which may open the way to eventually replenishing damaged in the clinic."

More information: Massimo Nichane et al. Isolation and 3D expansion of multipotent Sox9+ mouse lung progenitors, Nature Methods (2017). DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4498

Journal information: Nature Methods
Citation: Researchers find lung stem cell, heal lung injury in mice (2017, November 15) retrieved 25 April 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2017-11-lung-stem-cell-injury-mice.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

3-D organoids and RNA sequencing reveal the crosstalk driving lung cell formation

316 shares

Feedback to editors