Large-scale replication study challenges key evidence for the pro-active reading brain

April 10, 2018, Max Planck Society
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

When people read or listen to a conversation, their pro-active brains sometimes predict which word comes next. But a scientific team led by the MPI for Psycholinguistics now demonstrates that the predictive function of the human language system may operate differently than the field has come to believe in the last decade. Their study is the first large-scale, multi-laboratory replication effort for the field of cognitive neuroscience.

When listening to a speaker, we often feel that we know what they will say next. How is this possible? It is assumed that the routinely uses clues within a sentence to estimate the probability of upcoming words. Activating information about a word before it appears helps to rapidly integrate its meaning, once it appears, with the meaning of the sentence.

"For over 10 years, language scientists and neuroscientists have been guided by a high impact study published in Nature Neuroscience showing that these predictions by the brain are very detailed and can even include the first sound of an upcoming word," explains Mante Nieuwland, cognitive neuroscientist at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics (MPI) and the University of Edinburgh. These findings had, however, not yet been explicitly replicated since 2005, when the study came out.

Today, a new paper published in eLife by a scientific team led by Nieuwland of the MPI in the Netherlands questions the replicability of those results. The study is the first large-scale, multi-laboratory replication effort for the field of and shows that the predictive function of the system may operate differently than the field has come to believe.

Same question, state-of-the-art approach

"Inspired by recent demonstrations for the need for large subject-samples and more robust analyses in psychology and neuroscience research, we re-examined the research question of the original study. We did so by following the original methods and applying improved and current analysis methods," says Guillaume Rousselet from the University of Glasgow, co-author of the study. Furthermore, the researchers pre-registered their analyses, providing a time-stamped proof that their analysis was not tailored to achieve the reported results.

The team embarked on a massive brain imaging study: Across 9 UK laboratories (University of Birmingham, University of Bristol, University of Edinburgh University of Glasgow, University of Kent, University College London, University of Oxford, University of Stirling, and University of York), 334 participants - 10 times the original amount - read sentences that were presented one word at a time, while was recorded at the scalp. Each sentence contained an expected or unexpected combination of an and a (e.g., "The day was breezy so the boy went outside to fly a kite/an airplane").

Surprising nouns and articles

"We saw that unexpected nouns generated an increased brain response compared to expected nouns. Just like the original study," Nieuwland says. Nevertheless, this reaction, also called an enhanced N400 response, is not the core argument that the participants' brains actually anticipated the nouns. After all, it was generated after the nouns were read, and could mean that nouns like 'kite' are merely easier to process than nouns like 'airplane'.

The key evidence for prediction of a yet unseen noun was originally obtained on the preceding articles. In English, the correct use of the article 'a' or 'an' depends on the first sound of the next word. Even though 'a' and 'an' do not differ in their meaning, the 2005 study showed that unexpected articles also elicited an enhanced N400 response compared to expected articles. Presumably 'an' tells the readers that the next word cannot be 'kite'. This supported the claim that has stood since 2005 - that readers can make such precise predictions as the first sound of upcoming words.

"Crucially, our findings now show that there is no convincing evidence for this claim. With the original analysis, we did not replicate this pattern for the articles. With our improved analysis, we also did not find an effect that was statistically reliable, although the observed pattern did go in the expected direction," according to Nieuwland.

"Of course, it may be that people do predict the sound of upcoming words, but that they do not reliably use the articles to change their prediction. This could be because an unexpected article does not rule out that the expected noun will eventually appear ('a' can precede 'kite' if they are separated by another word, like in 'an old kite'). Also, we have to consider this study only investigates the English language. Other research has shown very different findings in languages such as Spanish, Dutch and French, for which articles correspond to nouns in grammatical gender regardless of intervening words. "

Less straightforward than assumed

The authors caution that these new findings should not be interpreted as being against prediction more generally. "There is a larger body of behavioural and neuroscience work that supports a role of prediction in language processing, for example of the meaning of an upcoming word, although many of those other results in the existing literature, especially in neuroscience, still need to be replicated." However, these new findings show that the reading brain is perhaps not as pro-active as is often assumed, by demonstrating a potential limit to the detail in which it predicts.

Explore further: Study sheds new light on how bilinguals process language

More information: Mante S Nieuwland et al, Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension, eLife (2018). DOI: 10.7554/eLife.33468

Related Stories

Study sheds new light on how bilinguals process language

April 9, 2018
Research led by a psychologist at the University of California, Riverside, shows that bilinguals regulate, or suppress, their native language when reading in a second language.

Sound trumps meaning in first language learning

March 12, 2014
A new study reveals that four-to-seven-year-old children rely on the sounds of new nouns more than on their meaning when assigning them to noun classes, even though the meaning is more predictive of noun class in the adult ...

Study: Word sounds contain clues for language learners

September 13, 2011
(PhysOrg.com) -- Why do words sound the way they do? For over a century, it has been a central tenet of linguistic theory that there is a completely arbitrary relationship between how a word sounds and what it means.

Our brain benefits from an overlap in grammar when learning a foreign language

June 29, 2016
Researchers from Nijmegen have for the first time captured images of the brain during the initial hours and days of learning a new language. They use an artificial language with real structures to show how new linguistic ...

Recommended for you

Study of protein 'trafficker' provides insight into autism and other brain disorders

September 22, 2018
In the brain, as in business, connections are everything. To maintain cellular associates, the outer surface of a neuron, its membrane, must express particular proteins—proverbial hands that reach out and greet nearby cells. ...

Breast milk may be best for premature babies' brain development

September 21, 2018
Babies born before their due date show better brain development when fed breast milk rather than formula, a study has found.

Early warning sign of psychosis detected

September 21, 2018
Brains of people at risk of psychosis exhibit a pattern that can help predict whether they will go on to develop full-fledged schizophrenia, a new Yale-led study shows. The findings could help doctors begin early intervention ...

White matter repair and traumatic brain injury

September 20, 2018
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability in the U.S., contributing to about 30 percent of all injury deaths, according to the CDC. TBI causes damage to both white and gray matter in the brain, ...

Gut branches of vagus nerve essential components of brain's reward and motivation system

September 20, 2018
A novel gut-to-brain neural circuit establishes the vagus nerve as an essential component of the brain system that regulates reward and motivation, according to research conducted at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount ...

Genomic dark matter activity connects Parkinson's and psychiatric diseases

September 20, 2018
Dopamine neurons are located in the midbrain, but their tendril-like axons can branch far into the higher cortical areas, influencing how we move and how we feel. New genetic evidence has revealed that these specialized cells ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.