Complete revascularization is superior to culprit-lesion only intervention

vascular
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

An international randomized trial has shown that complete revascularization reduces major cardiovascular events compared to culprit-lesion only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Late breaking results of the COMPLETE trial are presented in a Hot Line Session today at ESC Congress 2019 together with the World Congress of Cardiology and published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Up to 50 percent of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial (STEMI) have multivessel . This means that in addition to the blocked artery that caused the heart attack (known as the culprit artery), they have additional narrowed (called non-culprit) supplying blood to the heart.

In STEMI patients, opening the culprit artery with PCI reduces cardiovascular or myocardial infarction. It is unclear whether additional PCI of non-culprit also prevents these events.

"The question of whether to routinely revascularize non-culprit lesions or manage them conservatively with guideline-directed alone is a common dilemma," said principal investigator Professor Shamir R. Mehta of the Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Observational studies suggest a reduction in clinical events with staged, non-culprit lesion PCI, but are limited by selection bias and confounding. Prior randomized trials found declines in composite outcomes with non-culprit lesion PCI but were not powered to detect improvements in hard, irreversible clinical outcomes such as cardiovascular death or new myocardial infarction. While meta-analyses indicate a decline in cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction with non-culprit lesion PCI, there has been no single, large trial showing benefit on this clinically important outcome. The COMPLETE trial was designed to address this evidence gap.

A total of 4,041 patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease were enrolled from 140 centres in 31 countries. Patients were randomly allocated to complete revascularization with additional PCI of angiographically significant non-culprit lesions, or to no further revascularization. randomization was stratified by the intended timing of non-culprit lesion PCI: either during or after the index hospitalization.

The first co-primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction; the second co-primary outcome also included ischemia-driven revascularization.

At a median follow-up of three years, the first co-primary outcome of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction occurred in 158 patients (7.8 percent) in the complete revascularization group compared to 213 (10.5 percent) in the culprit-lesion only group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74; 95 percent confidence interval [CI] 0.60–0.91; p=0.004).

The second co-primary outcome of , , or ischemia-driven revascularization occurred in 179 patients (8.9 percent) in the complete revascularization group compared to 399 (16.7 percent) in the culprit-lesion only group (HR 0.51; 95 percent CI 0.43–0.61; p<0.001).

There were no significant differences between groups in the occurrence of stroke (p=0.27) or major bleeding (p=0.15).

Regarding the timing of non-culprit lesion PCI, complete revascularization consistently reduced the first co-primary outcome in those stratified to receive non-culprit lesion PCI during the index hospitalization (HR 0.77; 95 percent CI 0.59–1.00) and after hospital discharge (HR 0.69; 95 percent CI 0.49–0.97; interaction p=0.62).

Prof Mehta said: "COMPLETE is the first randomized trial to show that complete revascularization reduces hard cardiovascular events compared to culprit-lesion only PCI in patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease. The benefits emerged over the long term and were observed regardless of whether non-culprit lesion PCI was performed early, during the initial hospitalization or shortly after hospital discharge. These findings are likely to have a large impact on clinical practice and prevent many thousands of recurrent heart attacks globally every year."


Explore further

Should patients with cardiogenic shock receive culprit lesion only PCI or multivessel PCI?

More information: COMPLETE trial, ESC Congress 2019.
Journal information: New England Journal of Medicine

Citation: Complete revascularization is superior to culprit-lesion only intervention (2019, September 3) retrieved 17 October 2019 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-09-revascularization-superior-culprit-lesion-intervention.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more